<![CDATA[PunBB Forums - IE7 Fix(es)]]> 2007-05-14T11:22:00Z PunBB http://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/13471/ie7-fixes/ <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> I think it's already part of 1.2.14

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/1321/ 2007-05-14T11:22:00Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/94286/#p94286 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> Is this IE7 fix now part of 1.2.15 ?

--Alan

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/7177/ 2007-05-14T11:13:47Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/94283/#p94283 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> twohawks wrote:

lie2815.. I am looking at this today an its broken in ie5.5 (I did not yet look in ie6 or 7, I need to access with another pc later as those are not installed on mydev machine)...

Couple questions...
1) did you fix this already?
2) is that with cal 2.06 as the code shows, or did you upgrade (2.07b+ has a fix for the week display but I never observed a problem with the main...)

Please let me know if there's anything I need to consider patching in the calendar mod!
Thanks,

It's not fixed yet. I think I did install 2.07b, and I read something about this in the calendar mod post, but I will look at it again.

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/9678/ 2007-04-08T19:56:45Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/91399/#p91399 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> There is one (well, three in fact). But most people ignore it. And then, the standard let people decide on some interpretation. And the developers don't interpret these the same way.

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/2132/ 2007-04-01T16:56:43Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90981/#p90981 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> Why developers of browsers make this differents . They must agree on one standart.

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/10017/ 2007-04-01T13:52:42Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90961/#p90961 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> this is really weird...in some browsers (e.g. mozilla) the pun_main block moves down in viewtopic/viewforum.
Any fixing ideas?
www.bydebrasdesigns.com/biblestudy/forum

P.S.: it might be because  I changed my template because the width of the extra side blocks in PunPortal is bigger than in the miniportal mod

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/9678/ 2007-03-23T02:42:42Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90441/#p90441 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> Works in IE7

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/1209/ 2007-03-23T02:04:46Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90439/#p90439 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> lie2815.. I am looking at this today an its broken in ie5.5 (I did not yet look in ie6 or 7, I need to access with another pc later as those are not installed on mydev machine)...

Couple questions...
1) did you fix this already?
2) is that with cal 2.06 as the code shows, or did you upgrade (2.07b+ has a fix for the week display but I never observed a problem with the main...)

Please let me know if there's anything I need to consider patching in the calendar mod!
Thanks,

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/8442/ 2007-03-23T02:02:33Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90438/#p90438 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> Wow, thanks, Smartys.
I would have never noticed. (So easy - just looking at the HTML code). I actually just did a syntax error in my header.php file - have to go through that again...
Thanks again

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/9678/ 2007-03-22T02:35:36Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90390/#p90390 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> lie2815 wrote:

What is not valid XHTML?
The problem is, I can't fix it anymore

Your calendar page: you have some odd pun_include at the top of the page that hasn't been processed, for example

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/1209/ 2007-03-22T02:08:41Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90388/#p90388 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> What is not valid XHTML?
The problem is, I can't fix it anymore

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/9678/ 2007-03-22T02:05:09Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90387/#p90387 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> It's messed up in IE7 as well wink
You'll have to wait for Paul: I think it may have something to do with the way your page is set up and the fact that it's not valid XHTML

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/1209/ 2007-03-22T02:02:15Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90386/#p90386 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> Why is this "fix" messing up my calendar in IE 6?

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/9678/ 2007-03-22T01:40:12Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90385/#p90385 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> I just tried all that stuff out, and now that happened:
http://bydebrasdesigns.com/biblestudy/f … lendar.php
(only in AOL and IE)
Help?

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/9678/ 2007-03-21T21:14:10Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90367/#p90367 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> deadram wrote:

No way to win there, unless you included some code to help support IE7 better,

As with most problems, the real solution is education.  EVERY site you work on should detect IE7 (and other non-compliant browsers) and display something like the following:

"The browser you are using (print useragent info here) is not standards compliant and may incorrectly display, or even fail to display, some information we are providing to you.  In order to properly view the content of this and many other sites, you should obtain and install a browser that IS standards compliant, or contact your browser supplier, asking them why their product does not meet widely accepted professional standards.  If they are unable to give you a satisfactory answer, you should replace your current browser with one which is compliant. (insert a link here to a google search for "standards compliant browser")"

If EVERY Linux based site did this, perhaps a significant number of users would find out there is an option.  Don't blame it on users too stupid to change.  Inform them it is the result of predatory, anti-competitive actions of their browser supplier.  Even my wife was able to install FireFox.

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/9985/ 2007-03-21T20:43:21Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90362/#p90362