<![CDATA[PunBB Forums - SVN and Trac update]]> 2008-07-02T15:18:13Z PunBB http://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/19464/svn-and-trac-update/ <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> Thanks for the explanation, Anatoly.

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/11084/ 2008-07-02T15:18:13Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116358/#p116358 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> lie2815 wrote:

What? Is PunBB going to use Paul's markup, too?

I don't see why not, I think it's best for both projects to be on the same page come 1.3 stable. After that, they will start to deviate no doubt, but hopefully for good reasons, not just to be different.

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/1461/ 2008-07-02T14:04:13Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116352/#p116352 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> chriloi wrote:

Anatoly, what means "This is an empty revision for padding."? There are some days in trac when you pushed the revision number by 20 with these entries. What's the reason?

I have firstly created a single one repository for all our needs on PunBB. Now I've moved core and extensions to public repository, keeping changesets history and revision numbers to keep Trac links correct. Other files like punbb.informer.com root files and extension specifications (in Russian) left in developers-only repository.

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/12152/ 2008-07-02T12:39:32Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116350/#p116350 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> Anatoly, what means "This is an empty revision for padding."? There are some days in trac when you pushed the revision number by 20 with these entries. What's the reason?

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/11084/ 2008-07-02T11:50:26Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116348/#p116348 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> And if they don't use Pauls markup they use their own, right?

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/7189/ 2008-07-02T07:41:59Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116346/#p116346 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> lie2815 wrote:

What? Is PunBB going to use Paul's markup, too?

Possibly yes.

lie2815 wrote:

Why isn't the trac wiki available for "normal" users?

There's nothing useful yet (though I hope there will )).

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/12152/ 2008-07-02T07:29:20Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116345/#p116345 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> What? Is PunBB going to use Paul's markup, too?

Why isn't the trac wiki available for "normal" users?

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/9678/ 2008-07-02T07:04:37Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116342/#p116342 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> Very good,

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/13415/ 2008-07-02T05:56:06Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116337/#p116337 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> Aha, sorry. tongue

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/7189/ 2008-06-30T19:08:54Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116300/#p116300 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> grudon66 wrote:

Is the markup that paul did in the svn?

The new markup isn't even in the FluxBB svn yet.

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/1461/ 2008-06-30T16:48:18Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116290/#p116290 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> Very god news smile

Is the markup that paul did in the svn?

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/7189/ 2008-06-30T16:02:26Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116287/#p116287 <![CDATA[SVN and Trac update]]> Feel free to get latest revisions of 1.3 branch and official extensions from SVN repository http://punbb.informer.com/svn/
Trac timeline and tickets are also available.

]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/12152/ 2008-06-30T13:16:46Z http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116283/#p116283