<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[PunBB Forums - All subject type fields fixed at width 80....]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://punbb.informer.com/forums/feed/atom/topic/20457/"/>
	<updated>2009-05-02T15:26:58Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/20457/all-subject-type-fields-fixed-at-width-80/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: All subject type fields fixed at width 80....]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/127363/#p127363"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Using the CSS changes, I&#039;ve been able to correct this for most forms. The only one I can&#039;t figure out is the subject line for forum email.</p><p>Has anyone been able to adjust this successfully?</p><p>Thanks!</p><p>renee</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[fertilepress]]></name>
				<uri>http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/15382/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-02T15:26:58Z</updated>
			<id>http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/127363/#p127363</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: All subject type fields fixed at width 80....]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/120471/#p120471"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Adding, we&#039;re already seeing extensions that follow the same suit...</p><p>For example: the PM extension also has hardcoded field widths at 80.</p><p>So yes, probably better to address this now and put such width into some known .css markup, as Downliner suggests, while v1.3 is still fresh &amp; there exists few extensions.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Casemon]]></name>
				<uri>http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/13704/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-12-06T00:42:55Z</updated>
			<id>http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/120471/#p120471</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: All subject type fields fixed at width 80....]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/120470/#p120470"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I was going to ask the exact same question, when making a narrow skin I found drop downs and input boxes would always overflow.</p><p>I just added the following to my CSS:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>#brd-postedit #fld1,
#brd-postedit #fld2,
#brd-postedit div.longtext #fld3,
#brd-post #fld1,
#brd-post #fld2,
#brd-post div.longtext #fld3 { width:90%; }</code></pre></div><p>It seemed to do the trick in IE6/FF3 for users and guests making posts though obviously doesn&#039;t account for other pages that may have input fields.</p><p>Anyone from the devteam care to explain why input boxes have size=&quot;80&quot; hardcoded into pages such as post.php and edit.php? Not questioning your judgement, just found it odd that everything else is done through CSS but not input fields/dropdowns.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[downliner]]></name>
				<uri>http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/3145/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-12-06T00:39:40Z</updated>
			<id>http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/120470/#p120470</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[All subject type fields fixed at width 80....]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/120437/#p120437"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This makes integration a bit of pain; forces users to manually edit many files. Post, Admin, Settings, etc.</p><p>Is there a better way to do this? Maybe not hardcode a width at all?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Casemon]]></name>
				<uri>http://punbb.informer.com/forums/user/13704/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-12-05T13:24:22Z</updated>
			<id>http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/120437/#p120437</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
