<![CDATA[PunBB Forums - IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/13471/ie7-fixes/ Mon, 14 May 2007 11:22:00 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/94286/#p94286 I think it's already part of 1.2.14

]]> Mon, 14 May 2007 11:22:00 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/94286/#p94286 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/94283/#p94283 Is this IE7 fix now part of 1.2.15 ?

--Alan

]]> Mon, 14 May 2007 11:13:47 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/94283/#p94283 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/91399/#p91399 twohawks wrote:

lie2815.. I am looking at this today an its broken in ie5.5 (I did not yet look in ie6 or 7, I need to access with another pc later as those are not installed on mydev machine)...

Couple questions...
1) did you fix this already?
2) is that with cal 2.06 as the code shows, or did you upgrade (2.07b+ has a fix for the week display but I never observed a problem with the main...)

Please let me know if there's anything I need to consider patching in the calendar mod!
Thanks,

It's not fixed yet. I think I did install 2.07b, and I read something about this in the calendar mod post, but I will look at it again.

]]> Sun, 08 Apr 2007 19:56:45 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/91399/#p91399 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90981/#p90981 There is one (well, three in fact). But most people ignore it. And then, the standard let people decide on some interpretation. And the developers don't interpret these the same way.

]]> Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:56:43 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90981/#p90981 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90961/#p90961 Why developers of browsers make this differents . They must agree on one standart.

]]> Sun, 01 Apr 2007 13:52:42 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90961/#p90961 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90441/#p90441 this is really weird...in some browsers (e.g. mozilla) the pun_main block moves down in viewtopic/viewforum.
Any fixing ideas?
www.bydebrasdesigns.com/biblestudy/forum

P.S.: it might be because  I changed my template because the width of the extra side blocks in PunPortal is bigger than in the miniportal mod

]]> Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:42:42 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90441/#p90441 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90439/#p90439 Works in IE7

]]> Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:04:46 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90439/#p90439 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90438/#p90438 lie2815.. I am looking at this today an its broken in ie5.5 (I did not yet look in ie6 or 7, I need to access with another pc later as those are not installed on mydev machine)...

Couple questions...
1) did you fix this already?
2) is that with cal 2.06 as the code shows, or did you upgrade (2.07b+ has a fix for the week display but I never observed a problem with the main...)

Please let me know if there's anything I need to consider patching in the calendar mod!
Thanks,

]]> Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:02:33 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90438/#p90438 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90390/#p90390 Wow, thanks, Smartys.
I would have never noticed. (So easy - just looking at the HTML code). I actually just did a syntax error in my header.php file - have to go through that again...
Thanks again

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:35:36 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90390/#p90390 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90388/#p90388 lie2815 wrote:

What is not valid XHTML?
The problem is, I can't fix it anymore

Your calendar page: you have some odd pun_include at the top of the page that hasn't been processed, for example

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:08:41 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90388/#p90388 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90387/#p90387 What is not valid XHTML?
The problem is, I can't fix it anymore

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:05:09 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90387/#p90387 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90386/#p90386 It's messed up in IE7 as well wink
You'll have to wait for Paul: I think it may have something to do with the way your page is set up and the fact that it's not valid XHTML

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:02:15 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90386/#p90386 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90385/#p90385 Why is this "fix" messing up my calendar in IE 6?

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:40:12 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90385/#p90385 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90367/#p90367 I just tried all that stuff out, and now that happened:
http://bydebrasdesigns.com/biblestudy/f … lendar.php
(only in AOL and IE)
Help?

]]> Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:14:10 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90367/#p90367 <![CDATA[Re: IE7 Fix(es)]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90362/#p90362 deadram wrote:

No way to win there, unless you included some code to help support IE7 better,

As with most problems, the real solution is education.  EVERY site you work on should detect IE7 (and other non-compliant browsers) and display something like the following:

"The browser you are using (print useragent info here) is not standards compliant and may incorrectly display, or even fail to display, some information we are providing to you.  In order to properly view the content of this and many other sites, you should obtain and install a browser that IS standards compliant, or contact your browser supplier, asking them why their product does not meet widely accepted professional standards.  If they are unable to give you a satisfactory answer, you should replace your current browser with one which is compliant. (insert a link here to a google search for "standards compliant browser")"

If EVERY Linux based site did this, perhaps a significant number of users would find out there is an option.  Don't blame it on users too stupid to change.  Inform them it is the result of predatory, anti-competitive actions of their browser supplier.  Even my wife was able to install FireFox.

]]> Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:43:21 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/90362/#p90362