<![CDATA[PunBB Forums - PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/18151/punbb-13-beta/ Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:09:18 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/118217/#p118217 great, thank you guys.

]]> Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:09:18 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/118217/#p118217 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/114529/#p114529 MathsIsFun wrote:

Brilliant, thanks.

You can also update to the latest by downloading the updates with tortoiseSVN f.e.

]]> Wed, 07 May 2008 14:23:09 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/114529/#p114529 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/114524/#p114524 Brilliant, thanks.

]]> Wed, 07 May 2008 11:53:53 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/114524/#p114524 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/114523/#p114523 http://dev.punbb.org/browser/branches/punbb-1.3-dev

"Download in other formats: Zip Archive"

]]> Wed, 07 May 2008 11:50:53 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/114523/#p114523 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/114521/#p114521 Is there a beta version more recent than 30 Jan 08?

]]> Wed, 07 May 2008 11:40:09 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/114521/#p114521 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/111556/#p111556 I got to say I installed PunBB 1.3 and it looks awesome and simple. Nice progress since the very first releases I saw a long time ago.

]]> Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:05:45 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/111556/#p111556 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/110060/#p110060 When will the documentation be ready?

]]> Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:09:22 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/110060/#p110060 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109839/#p109839 PunBG: Please take your discussion to the Beta talk forum wink

]]> Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:36:10 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109839/#p109839 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109838/#p109838 I cleared cache directory and returned first settings. But I couldn't understand why didn't work this mod on my server. I use Hostgator and I think there's no problem. I uploaded .htaccess file in root directory of forum.

]]> Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:25:50 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109838/#p109838 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109459/#p109459 Dr.Jeckyl wrote:

LOL! I can't seem to find the thread but it's been discussed.

I can't find that/those topic(s) either, but the following is in the MDK:

Rickard wrote:

Version numbering: The first release of a mod should always be 1.0. 1.0.1
                     is a bug fix release based on 1.0. If the new version
                     offers added features or a large number of bugfixes it
                     could be called 1.1. Stepping up to version 2.0 would
                     more or less require a complete rewrite of the mod.

PunBB follows those same Unix-style naming conventions.

]]> Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:27:22 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109459/#p109459 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109261/#p109261 LOL! I can't seem to find the thread but it's been discussed.

]]> Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:43:42 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109261/#p109261 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109232/#p109232 Dr.Jeckyl wrote:

How many times have we been through the reasoning behind Rickard and the dev teams way of versioning PunBB? tongue

I don't know but I'm sure your gonna tell us.

]]> Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:17:23 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109232/#p109232 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109215/#p109215 How many times have we been through the reasoning behind Rickard and the dev teams way of versioning PunBB? tongue

]]> Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:28:57 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109215/#p109215 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109211/#p109211 ortzinator wrote:

I didn't say anything about other scripts... Why would you even compare two scripts based on the version numbers?

I didn't, but there does generally tend to be a notable increase in people mentioning larger version numbers when alternative software has upped it's primary point.

]]> Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:57:42 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109211/#p109211 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 Beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109209/#p109209 ortzinator wrote:

So maybe the devs should decide their own rules for versioning.

They have, and it's reached 1.3. big_smile There are no rules for versioning. They are just commonly followed/accepted norms, so to speak.

]]> Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:54:46 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/109209/#p109209