<![CDATA[PunBB Forums - PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/19370/punbb-13-official-extensions/ Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:25:04 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/121362/#p121362 pun_karma is being upgraded and confirmed for 1.3.2 by the Informer PunBB crew.  That was just decided this week, so it isn't even in SVN yet.

http://punbb.informer.com/svn/additions … xtensions/

]]> Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:25:04 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/121362/#p121362 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/121356/#p121356 Is pun_karma compatible with 1.3.2? I can't find a place to download

]]> Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:44:46 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/121356/#p121356 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116937/#p116937 elbekko wrote:

Copyright, especially as intrusive as that, should be in the code, not cluttering your view.

Partially agree. Feel free to disable it.

]]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:58:57 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116937/#p116937 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116934/#p116934 Copyright, especially as intrusive as that, should be in the code, not cluttering your view.

]]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:23:30 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116934/#p116934 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116933/#p116933 Anatoly wrote:
MattF wrote:

However, they're specifically written with the intent of being used with PunBB, so where's the problem?

We do have in mind that the extension will be possibly used under FluxBB. And I don't see any issues here.

Not inferring that there are any issues or exclusions. Flux compatibility is something that you cannot guarantee, however, if your code base does start diverging and becoming distinct. Hence the point.

]]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:02:56 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116933/#p116933 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116915/#p116915 Utchin wrote:

no im just saying that its pointless having the copyright notice there when people use in on fluxbb...

You start Adobe Photoshop under Microsoft Windows. Is Adobe copyright pointless because of Windows having Microsoft copyright?
I think it is especially important to point that extension used is not part of FluxBB. As well as Photoshop is not part of Windows.

MattF wrote:

However, they're specifically written with the intent of being used with PunBB, so where's the problem?

We do have in mind that the extension will be possibly used under FluxBB. And I don't see any issues here.

]]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:14:36 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116915/#p116915 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116905/#p116905 Utchin wrote:

no im just saying that its pointless having the copyright notice there when people use in on fluxbb...

I'm completely missing your point here. The extensions are written for PunBB. The fact that they also work with FluxBB is obviously due to the same codebase being used. However, they're specifically written with the intent of being used with PunBB, so where's the problem?

Not trying to be awkward Matt, but this sounds like you're arguing just for the sake of argument.

]]> Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:16:58 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116905/#p116905 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116904/#p116904 no im just saying that its pointless having the copyright notice there when people use in on fluxbb...

]]> Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:18:14 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116904/#p116904 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116903/#p116903 Just disable it.

]]> Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:01:58 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116903/#p116903 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116899/#p116899 there is no need for the copy right notice it makes a forum look that little bit complicated for new people.

]]> Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:56:31 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116899/#p116899 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116883/#p116883 Utchin wrote:

just i dont think you need to put the copyright notice on that extension?

I still don't get the problem.
If you don't like it: just disable it )
Though I suppose it is OK to put visible copyright notice to refer to the code author.

]]> Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:08:59 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116883/#p116883 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116878/#p116878 that was just something to bump the topic up lol..

yeah eg this site

Currently used extensions: pun_extension_reinstaller, pun_topic_online_users, pun_karma, pun_e_mail_auth, pun_repository, pun_bbcode. Copyright © 2008 PunBB

just i dont think you need to put the copyright notice on that extension?

]]> Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:40:13 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116878/#p116878 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116875/#p116875 Utchin wrote:

Any reason why you have "Copyright © 2008 <a href="http://punbb.informer.com/">PunBB</a>" In the extension hook browser. Its not needed and if its used on fluxbb it can make it look weird and useless.?

Could you please explain what's the real problem? Are you talking about "Currently used extensions" list in the bottom?
I don't get the idea of "if its used on fluxbb it can make it look weird and useless".

]]> Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:31:45 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116875/#p116875 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116873/#p116873 i just dont see the point in this. you shouldnt brand all your extensions just so it shows on a fluxbb forum?

•BUMP•

]]> Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:24:16 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116873/#p116873 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB 1.3 official extensions]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116860/#p116860 Any reason why you have "Copyright &copy; 2008 <a href="http://punbb.informer.com/">PunBB</a>" In the extension hook browser. Its not needed and if its used on fluxbb it can make it look weird and useless.?

]]> Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:09:53 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116860/#p116860