<![CDATA[PunBB Forums - SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/19464/svn-and-trac-update/ Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:18:13 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116358/#p116358 Thanks for the explanation, Anatoly.

]]> Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:18:13 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116358/#p116358 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116352/#p116352 lie2815 wrote:

What? Is PunBB going to use Paul's markup, too?

I don't see why not, I think it's best for both projects to be on the same page come 1.3 stable. After that, they will start to deviate no doubt, but hopefully for good reasons, not just to be different.

]]> Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:04:13 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116352/#p116352 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116350/#p116350 chriloi wrote:

Anatoly, what means "This is an empty revision for padding."? There are some days in trac when you pushed the revision number by 20 with these entries. What's the reason?

I have firstly created a single one repository for all our needs on PunBB. Now I've moved core and extensions to public repository, keeping changesets history and revision numbers to keep Trac links correct. Other files like punbb.informer.com root files and extension specifications (in Russian) left in developers-only repository.

]]> Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:39:32 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116350/#p116350 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116348/#p116348 Anatoly, what means "This is an empty revision for padding."? There are some days in trac when you pushed the revision number by 20 with these entries. What's the reason?

]]> Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:50:26 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116348/#p116348 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116346/#p116346 And if they don't use Pauls markup they use their own, right?

]]> Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:41:59 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116346/#p116346 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116345/#p116345 lie2815 wrote:

What? Is PunBB going to use Paul's markup, too?

Possibly yes.

lie2815 wrote:

Why isn't the trac wiki available for "normal" users?

There's nothing useful yet (though I hope there will )).

]]> Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:29:20 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116345/#p116345 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116342/#p116342 What? Is PunBB going to use Paul's markup, too?

Why isn't the trac wiki available for "normal" users?

]]> Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:04:37 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116342/#p116342 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116337/#p116337 Very good,

]]> Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:56:06 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116337/#p116337 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116300/#p116300 Aha, sorry. tongue

]]> Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:08:54 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116300/#p116300 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116290/#p116290 grudon66 wrote:

Is the markup that paul did in the svn?

The new markup isn't even in the FluxBB svn yet.

]]> Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:48:18 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116290/#p116290 <![CDATA[Re: SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116287/#p116287 Very god news smile

Is the markup that paul did in the svn?

]]> Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:02:26 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116287/#p116287 <![CDATA[SVN and Trac update]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116283/#p116283 Feel free to get latest revisions of 1.3 branch and official extensions from SVN repository http://punbb.informer.com/svn/
Trac timeline and tickets are also available.

]]> Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:16:46 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/116283/#p116283