<![CDATA[PunBB Forums - PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/20980/punbbnet-beta/ Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:44:11 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128509/#p128509 juan99 wrote:

I'll try to write something about my experiences and give some suggestions for design goals.

We will appreciate it a lot!

]]> Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:44:11 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128509/#p128509 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128508/#p128508 Thank you for your words guys! It is a good support fr us!

]]> Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:42:44 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128508/#p128508 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128421/#p128421 I think it is a great idea to write the forums in .NET.  Believe me, there is a need for a nice, clean forum that functions on the .net platform. 

Many developers don't have a choice of their platform, or are already tied into .NET and need to keep using it.

I have a fair amount of experience using YAF, and I'll try to write something about my experiences and give some suggestions for design goals.

]]> Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:57:39 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128421/#p128421 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128154/#p128154 I like the PunBB.NET a lot .. thanks!

]]> Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:18:22 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128154/#p128154 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128070/#p128070 so what happend to this project? tongue any sample?

]]> Sat, 30 May 2009 10:09:33 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/128070/#p128070 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/127801/#p127801 PunBB.NET (Forum engine) you can see here http://www.codeplex.com/PunbbNet/Releas … seId=22945

]]> Tue, 19 May 2009 11:07:54 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/127801/#p127801 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125525/#p125525 Hi,

Good work you are doing here. Since it is a free sevice, there is little I can complain about.  I think is not wise to develop the same thing with the same functions using different technologies. I am sure your team must have has a lot of discussions about it. Take it from me, it is a VERY VERY BAD idea.

It is bad enough that there are too many forums not to talk of one company with two. I am sure you guys have seen a reduction in the rate of downloads of PUN BB.

Just take a second to imagine a company having another complete factory to make the exact same car with a different material. Or Imagine Wordpress deciding to use have a paralell blog system in a different language doing the same thing.  You cannot tell me you believe it is a good decision. Listen to your users.

There might be commercial reasons for the .NET but you can decide to abandon the PHP and move full speed ahead and those who want PHP can move to fluxBB, and those who want .NET can stay.

You have Facebook using your forum, you can Capitalize on that and make PunBB the greatest forum ever made. Do not destroy your own success.

If you want proof that PunBB.NET is a distration, this forum is it. The time that would have been spent thinking of how to develop PunBB is used to talk here. Tell your sponsors it is a VERY BAD idea. I leave you with one advise and it is the Acronym of FOCUS. Follow One Course Until Successful!

Cheers!

]]> Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:57:45 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125525/#p125525 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125499/#p125499 lie2815 wrote:

Your demo does not work.

The server was off due to techical reasons. Now everything is fine.

]]> Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:31:30 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125499/#p125499 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125487/#p125487 Your demo does not work.

]]> Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:29:35 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125487/#p125487 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125250/#p125250 Very nice indeed.

I must say, .NET 1 seemed a bit crappy, but I've had a chance to use .NET 3.5 at work, with VS2008, and it is AWESOME

Also note that it is not ASP, but ASP.NET. Worlds of difference between them

]]> Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:14:41 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125250/#p125250 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124843/#p124843 So why don't you hire two more php devels? I have no problem against ASP, but I only have fear that punbb 1.4 will take the same time to develop that 1.3 did.

If .net developers are not hired, then just ignore this message wink

]]> Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:10:13 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124843/#p124843 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124752/#p124752 PHP and .NET programming skills are very different. PunBB.NET devs are not too good in PHP and we are not good in .NET. So we couldn't just join .NET-team to PHP-team - this would be useless. And vice versa.

]]> Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:55:47 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124752/#p124752 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124685/#p124685 I'm sad to see your development team broken in half, this will only slow down PunBB development. I've never heard of a company support a web product for 2 platforms. sad Especially if you try to keep them at the same level with the same features, I just dont see that working out good at all. Building more extensions for PunBB would of increased its popularity a lot more than any .NET version. neutral

]]> Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:56:15 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124685/#p124685 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124575/#p124575 Since there are 2 developers working in punbb.net that are not working on punbb.org, there is the loss for punbb I think. Why have 2 teams while could have one bigger more powerfull team?

Also, punbb 1.3 took so long to launch, and now I don't see a punbb 1.3.3 until maybe the end of 2009. I will rather see more mod finished and maybe an upgrade routine that does not truncate all of your 1.2 forum text in your DB(migration to UTF-8 is broken and should not ship).

Of course there is place for all programing languages, but maintaing 2 code base is like shipping a forum with custom implementation of php5 in php4, a lost of time in my view. "Reuse as much as you can" should be the idea.

Good luck and let see how this evolves

Oliver

]]> Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:39:47 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124575/#p124575 <![CDATA[Re: PunBB.NET beta]]> http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124536/#p124536 patheticcockroach wrote:

When I saw this PunBB.Net news I almost had an heart attack

All you guys who are so discouraged because of PunBB.NET should understand that this project will make absolutely no harm to PHP PunBB. I've already wrote it here, but it seems to me i should do it again. PunBB and PunBB.NET are two separate projects. If you don't want to support PunBB.NET it's your choice. And we assure you that PunBB.NET won't replace PHP PunBB.

patheticcockroach wrote:

I was feeling bad I didn't find the time to finish my extension, now I'm pretty happy with that...

I think you should finish your extension smile

]]> Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:42:25 +0000 http://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/124536/#p124536