Et corrigé, merci.
Je rajouterais les traductions des chaînes dans le fichier.
Unfortunately no one can be told what PunBB is - you have to see it for yourself.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
PunBB Forums » Posts by Jérémie
Et corrigé, merci.
Je rajouterais les traductions des chaînes dans le fichier.
Thanks.
Edit: there's no more InnoDB engine in Pun1.3 ?
Yup j'avais vu la chaîne manquante mais comme j'ai un peu lâché PunBB, je ne savais pas si c'était un bug à nous ou à eux.
Quelqu'un pour le signaler aux devs ?
J'ai un bug à l'installation quand je switch de l'anglais au français :
Notice: Undefined index: Default language help in /punbb/test/admin/install.php on line 320Ça vient de chez nous, ou alors c'est un bug PunBB ?
Correct
Pas ce we donc pour les derniers fichiers, mais ils seront up dans la semaine.
Edit : Je suis entrain de finir de traduire le reste (tout fait, il reste que la moitié de l'installation et le test en live à faire).
[*]install.php n'a pas encore été fait (j'ai commencé par l'interface utilisateur final).[/*]
[*]idem pour les templates mail, ils ne sont pas terminés (et cette fois c'est un oubli).[/*]
Je vais voir si je peux faire les deux ce week-end.
[*]Attention à common.php, ligne 72 : tu as supprimé le caractère   mais laissé trainer le ;[/*]
Pas supprimé mais remplacé par le vrai espace insécable au lieu de l'entité. Oups pour le ; par contre.
Extrait de Wikipedia : Le terme « binette » est recommandé par la Délégation générale à la langue française et aux langues de France (DGLF) ainsi que par l'Office québécois de la langue française (OQLF) (depuis 1995) pour remplacer le terme smiley. Parmi les autres termes proposés, on trouvera « frimousse », « souriard », « souriant », « trombine », « tronche », « bouille », « mimique », « bonhomme sourire », voire « p'tit bonhomme qui rigole », plus simplement « tête », et « émoticône » comme mentionné plus haut.
C'est pas le même bureau qui voulait remplacer webmaster par vaguemestre ? ![]()
On vote (parmi les options ci-dessus + garder "smiley" tel quel) ?
Émoticône est le plus utilisé.
Mimique est personnellement mon préféré, mais comme binette je ne crois pas l'avoir jamais vu utilisé.
On peut voter, ou choisir un consensus. Mais à mon sens il faut utiliser le moins laid et le plus juste parmi les termes déjà répandus, plutôt que d'utiliser un terme inconnu des utilisateurs. Que cela reste simple pour l'utilisateur final.
Oki
install.php n'est pas traduit, c'est normal ou c'est juste pas encore fait ?
De même, certains messages d'emails ne le sont pas. Pareil, normal, pas normal ?
Je peux les traduire, je veux être juste sûr que ce n'est pas voulu pour une raison ou pour une autre ![]()
Sinon, fichier uploadé avec les modifs. 2/3 orthographes, les accents sur les majuscules (si j'en ai pas oublié), et quelques points typographiques (les nbsp, les apostrophes correctes, etc.). J'ai supprimé les deux &thinsp qui étaient utilisés, d'abord pour des raisons de cohérence (juste à deux endroits et pas ailleurs) mais surtout parce qu'il me semble bien que beaucoup de navigateurs ne peuvent pas afficher ce caractère. Si quelqu'un a des informations contradictoires ceci dit ça m'intéresse grandement, j'aurais tous mes parseurs à refaire avec ![]()
Deux choses quand même, puisque vous pourriez ne pas être d'accord : j'ai traduit «tag» (par balise, comme il se doit), et j'ai changé Reason->Raison en ->Motif qui me semble plus correct dans cet emploi.
Sinon, l'emploi de «binette» pour traduire smiley... heu.. personnellement, c'est la toute première fois que je vois ça. Je ne suis pas sûr que les usagers comprennent. C'est pas que c'est mal trouvé (plutôt mieux que souriards et les autres d'ailleurs), juste que ce n'est pas très répandu (voir pas du tout).
De toutes façons, Mattf ne parle que pour lui-même et pas pour les autres.
Sinon est-ce que le fichier du wiki est le dernier à jour ? Je peux faire des corrections typographiques dessus, mais autant éviter les merge hasardeux par la suite ![]()
The best way would be just for us all to stick to our respective forum of choice, and, to all intents and purposes, try to ignore the fact that the other does exist.
As you mention however, that would be to the users detriment, especially on here.
But without it, they don't have any motivation to switch.
I say leave PunBB community by itself, and the other way around leave FluxBB community by itself. Over time, each and everyone will choose what software is best for them.
With of course the massive exception of a lot of forum owner who don't give a fart about code ownership, don't know and don't care what a fork is. They have PunBB, or have heard of, they will stick to it. FluxBB would have to get its own reputation by itself: good coding, good product, release early, release often, stop releasing 3 years after the facts.
mmm i cant understand a thing now. whats going on. i thought you guys said that you want to make punbb 1.3 as fluxbb 1.3 and change the future goals. so what version of punbb is this.
Simple: PunBB 1.3 RC is (for the most part, to say the least) FluxBB beta 2.5.
Not trying to be impatient or anything, but how much longer?
Can we have an approximate date?
I doubt it.
Last post of the last, only, PunBB official? 22 days ago.
PunBB is six feet under.
Some of us are going to make templates yes, but for FluxBB.
If PunBB wants one, I'm sure we could fine an arrangement. They can send us their budget for this work.
And CMS, and Wiki, and a lot of others softwares, by the way...
By itself it's a bad idea, because some human browse the web without CSS support (blind people for one, but also some hand held device, etc.).
Yup please please, don't overdo the i18n system. Don't cut phrases into small pieces, and don't over-reuse phrases out of context.
Some languages have very different grammatical system, syntax rules, and such. It's much, much better to have to re-write a word a dozen times around while localizing, than having to go around the system or butcher the localization because of the system used.
That's easy. 1+1=3, for very very large values of one.
No, but before switching my active forums to 1.3 I will wait until it was deployed on a large scale without issue, plus some time necessary to re-create the stylesheets and turn some hacks into plugins.
But overall no, 1.2 has major issues bugging me.
The problem of course is that we have to make assumptions about what variables are available to us for use (and I have a feeling that the code for generating the descriptions would be long).
The output isn't buffered? You can't ?go back? to set the string after you processed the content of the page?
Why not set an appropriate meta description? Dynamically, based on what's on the page (thread view, forums, view, etc.)?
It is risky though.
Especially when even the PunBB team doesn't switch these forums to 1.3 beta, or RC ![]()
This plugin allows you to quickly and easily make a database backup and then transfer it in a number of ways.
I don't know if DB is the only scope of this plugin, but if so it would be nice to rename it to a more precise title (to backup a Pun install, one has to save more than just the database).
In any case, nice work on the remote storage of the dump.
Because it would very much go against the PunBB idea of being fast, small, and simple. And as Bekko said, some browsers don't support it, some users don't use Javascript, etc. Extensions are certainly free to implement AJAX-ish features, but I doubt we'll see them in the core.
On some cases, AJAX is lighter and faster than pure HTML (which one has to have, to degrade gracefully).
One Pun example on the top of my head is item sorting: when you reorganize your forum, it would be faster to just click and drop forums in the correct order than to input sorting key by hand, one by one.
Ok that one is not something done everyday so a full ajax framework written just for that isn't probably a good idea, but you get my point. AJAX is not, by itself, automatically slower ![]()
punBB should get the 10 things right that phpBB3 got so, so wrong...
Another, largely recognized as poor, forum software suposed wrong doesn't mean Pun _should_ correct it. maybe it's not under Pun's scope, for example? No?
* Page titles are still horrible, including the ?Index page?, very descriptive?
That may be a good one, I haven't checked it myself... I'm sure a lot of other people have but still, I'll look into it for my own curiosity and possible improvement reports.
* No XML sitemaps?
Given that's now a de facto standard, and more or less open, and given the fact 99% of forum user will want their forums indexed, having it in the core would indeed be a good thing.
Beside, it's not long or difficult to do.
* RSS is a major part of ?web 2.0?, yet phpBB 3.0 still hasn?t mastered them!
RSS isn't a major part of anything, and there's no such thing as ?Web 2.0?. On top of that, RSS specs are inexistant, to the point where some RSS author have given up and switched to Atom. Atom is good, but it isn't a major part of anything either.
* Unfortunately phpBB is one of the few notable forums out there, nothing else works quite like it.
Thank god most software don't work like phpbb.
But there's plenty of other forum software, some incredibly faster, ligther and more secure than phpbb. Pun is one of them, or maybe just The One.
* They pioneered things like bbCode which means users can add easy to understand markup to their comments.
bbcode is another thing phpbb will have to answer to when it's dead. bbcode that's just a lame, lazy developer who, once upon a time, thought: ?oh, allowing html is bad, it can break things. Ok I won't bother filtering out the bad or in the good, I'll just forbid everything <>. Oh, user are asking for some feature... bah, let's now use [], and some über limited syntax of a tiny part of the current html. Someone will fix this whole thing in the future?. And it stuck.
* It?s open source and GPL so it appeals to all the freetards out there.
Not much to do with philosophy. True open source software tend just to be cheaper to create, support, use, and overall of better quality.
There's exceptions everywhere, of course.
* There?s quite a large community that offer mods, styles and support.
Community support is vital for an open source internet software. Pun has quite a good community.
Overall, before spamming your things, and talking phpbb-ish only, maybe you should inquire yourself about where your post, and what it's about.
PunBB Forums » Posts by Jérémie
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 5 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.