https://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/18296/punlink-usage/ Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:21:43 +0000 PunBB https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/108914/#p108914 I think he meant using pun_link('include/js/common.js') as opposed to concatenating the path with base URL. Doing either would have the same effect, the difference is whether we want to mandate that people use pun_url for everything or only when rewriting.

]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:21:43 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/108914/#p108914 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/108900/#p108900 Because there's no need for url rewrite support. The same applies to the css files.

]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:47:56 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/108900/#p108900 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/108881/#p108881 In header.php, the JS include (line 115) uses $base_url instead of pun_link(). Is there any reason for this?

]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:59:03 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/108881/#p108881