<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[PunBB Forums — Plans for markup changes]]></title>
		<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/21290/plans-for-markup-changes/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://punbb.informer.com/forums/feed/rss/topic/21290/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Plans for markup changes.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:49:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Plans for markup changes]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125617/#p125617</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I understand. One thing which brings me concern is that you arnt focusing on 1.3? well you are for now but your focus will be on a newer version.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Utchin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125617/#p125617</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Plans for markup changes]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125615/#p125615</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree.</p><p>But it is logical that a new markup (or maybe some kind of template system) will be adopted in the next version of PunBB. To change the markup of 1.3 means at least to cause a headache to extension developers. Personally I&#039;d like to fix all bugs of 1.3 and to start developing of a new version.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Parpalak)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125615/#p125615</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Plans for markup changes]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125572/#p125572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would strongly rethink the actions said above.</p><p>The markup/css is no where near ready for proper use as intended to. It wasn&#039;t designed to be used properly and thus isn&#039;t as friendly and as good as it could be, this is the reason its being redesigned.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Utchin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125572/#p125572</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Plans for markup changes]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125569/#p125569</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No markup changes are planned for PunBB 1.3. We&#039;ve had enough while adopting Paul&#039;s markup for PunBB 1.3 final release.</p><p>However, the markup contains several bugs. We&#039;ll fix them.</p><p>We don&#039;t plan to import code changes from FluxBB 1.3 except certain bug fixes.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Parpalak)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125569/#p125569</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Plans for markup changes]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125565/#p125565</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is PunBB planning on using the markup changes that Fluxbb 1.3 will create, once it is released? </p><p>What are your plans regarding fluxbb 1.3? Will you use any of the code for improvments to PunBB ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Utchin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/125565/#p125565</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
