<![CDATA[PunBB Forums — Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/2762/adminsmoderators-only-for-categories/ Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:51:45 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6727/#p6727

fly wrote:

i have been lost to the 'dark side' http://x.agent-penguin.net i wasn't getting any members so i decided to go with a forum that could look really good. and it helped.

Offtopic, but fly started it! :)

I doubt the increase in members had anything to do with your choice of bb-software. Why would anyone not join a board just because they thought it was ugly? :)

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:51:45 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6727/#p6727 <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6725/#p6725 1.1 will now incorporate this change.

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:59:32 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6725/#p6725 <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6248/#p6248 fly: I guess our opinion on what "looks good" is different then ;)

]]> Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:10:57 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6248/#p6248 <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6245/#p6245 i have been lost to the 'dark side' http://x.agent-penguin.net i wasn't getting any members so i decided to go with a forum that could look really good. and it helped.

]]> Sat, 27 Sep 2003 08:39:00 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6245/#p6245 <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6244/#p6244

Hewitt wrote:

Then I'm okay with it. smile

Agreed.

wink

]]> Sat, 27 Sep 2003 07:18:17 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6244/#p6244 <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6242/#p6242 Then I'm okay with it. smile

]]> Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:25:58 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6242/#p6242 <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6240/#p6240 Frank H, Hewitt: Yepp, that won't be affected.

fly: :D

]]> Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:33:10 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6240/#p6240 <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6238/#p6238 if you do that im not upgrading o.o

]]> Fri, 26 Sep 2003 22:50:14 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6238/#p6238 <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6233/#p6233

Frank H wrote:

if the category still is invisible for normal users if all the forums within that category is admin/mod only ... then I don't see a problem with it

Agreed.

]]> Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:57:30 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6233/#p6233 <![CDATA[Re: Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6230/#p6230 if the category still is invisible for normal users if all the forums within that category is admin/mod only ... then I don't see a problem with it

]]> Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:34:59 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6230/#p6230 <![CDATA[Admins/moderators only for categories]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6229/#p6229 I'm considering removing the ability to make a complete category admin/mod only. As it is now, the feature is only a lazy way of making all forums within that category admin/mod only. Thus, no functionality will be removed.

The reason I want to remove it is making a few queries a little simpler. Especially for "recent discussions" where I won't have to join in the category table if only forums can be admin/mod only.

What do you say?

Edit: Typo.

]]> Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:18:46 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/6229/#p6229