<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[PunBB Forums — Dynamic ranking]]></title>
		<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/4502/dynamic-ranking/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://punbb.informer.com/forums/feed/rss/topic/4502/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Dynamic ranking.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 15:20:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/20082/#p20082</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Rewarding people for starting new topics is hardly something I would want to do. It&#039;s a big problem over at sweclockers.com, where people start new topics about stuff all the time even though there are already hundreds of topics on the same subject.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Rickard)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 15:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/20082/#p20082</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/20077/#p20077</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>what about a points system?&nbsp; you know:<br />1 topic = 5 points<br />1 gained reply = 2 points<br />1 post = 2 points<br />etc. etc.</p><p>and use a point system for ranks instead?</p><p>.: AbstracT :.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (AbstracT)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 14:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/20077/#p20077</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19684/#p19684</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>lol go on holiday, you come back and its like you have to start again... ouch</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Connorhd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19684/#p19684</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19682/#p19682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think people would enjoy being &quot;pushed down&quot; one step if they are inactive for a while.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Rickard)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19682/#p19682</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19674/#p19674</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>but this is directly compareable to the current ranking system...</p><p>as you get more posts the current system needs changing up</p><p>as you get more posts in your system it needs moving down</p><p>therefore there is no point in having it, except for the active members thing, but then you have good and bad weeks in a forum and i dunno if it would work well and would it not be better being imkplemented on the current system rather than a % one?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Connorhd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19674/#p19674</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19662/#p19662</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Rickard wrote:</cite><blockquote><p> In large forums, we would end up with 0.1% ranks and stuff like that. Say the forums have a million posts.</p></blockquote></div><p>So? If you wan&#039;t to have 5 ranks does it matter if the first is 0% to 0.1%, the next 0.1% -&gt; 1%, etc.? As long as the percentages can be changed then it should be fine. </p><p>The problem wouldn&#039;t be with large forums, but with small forums. Say the total posts is 50 (early in the forums history...), one post would be 2% of the total posts. A big thread could lead to lots of title changes, because as each person posts, their percentage of the total would change a lot. Say I have 20 posts of 40, that&#039;s 50%, but if a big thread comes along and I know have 20 posts of 60, now I only have 33% of the total. In a forum with a million posts, 1 post would only be 0.0001%, so ratings would be more stable (although it would be hard to increase your rating...)</p><p>Perhaps if instead of the total posts, the number of posts in the last week or two weeks could be used. It most probably won&#039;t be anywhere near one million, but the percentages would still be fairly distinct. Such a system wwould reward currently active members, instead of people who posted for a bit, and didn&#039;t stay.</p><p>Anyway, I&#039;m just rambling on... maybe when 1.2 is released i&#039;ll work on this as a mod <img src="https://punbb.informer.com/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Cornflake)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19662/#p19662</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19643/#p19643</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>may as well have the current system, not that this is really an important suggestion just an idea to make life esier for me <img src="https://punbb.informer.com/forums/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Connorhd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19643/#p19643</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19642/#p19642</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Cornflake: In large forums, we would end up with 0.1% ranks and stuff like that. Say the forums have a million posts.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Rickard)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19642/#p19642</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19639/#p19639</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>i dunno if that would work as a forum grows the ranks would need to be lowered so it would have the same maintenance as normal rankings</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Connorhd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19639/#p19639</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19638/#p19638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why not cache the total number of posts, and then make each person&#039;s rank dependent on what percentage of the forums total posts they have?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Cornflake)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19638/#p19638</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19572/#p19572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>ahh yeh i suppose the amount of time to work it out when there are alot of posts on one page would make it really dirty and not really worth it... just means i have to edit my ranks as my forum grows lol or make them so huge no one will ever reach the top</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Connorhd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19572/#p19572</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19566/#p19566</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It would involve running a database query to find out whether a user is within the first 25% of whatever. That query would have to run every time a rank was displayed. The answer is therefore, no :)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Rickard)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19566/#p19566</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dynamic ranking]]></title>
			<link>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19560/#p19560</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>dunno if this has been done before or if its feasable but what if you could have dynamic ranks e.g. % ranks so first 25% are newbies or 10% or whatever instead of a postcount, as when you start a forum the ranks might be lower than as your forum grows</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Connorhd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/19560/#p19560</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
