<![CDATA[PunBB Forums — Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/topic/8671/google-talk/ Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:44:15 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60498/#p60498 Bassguy wrote:
analogue wrote:

NOW Jabber and GTalk are compatible, the merge has been done this morning wink

You could always use a jabber client to message with GTalk users, though. I ran it on my *nix box using Gaim on launch day.

... Geee, the Google XMPP network wasn't plugged to the Jabber XMPP network now it is. What you did was to use a XMPP client on the Google XMPP network, but you couldn't talk from a Google XMPP account to a Jabber XMPP account.

]]> Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:44:15 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60498/#p60498 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60496/#p60496 analogue wrote:

NOW Jabber and GTalk are compatible, the merge has been done this morning wink

You could always use a jabber client to message with GTalk users, though. I ran it on my *nix box using Gaim on launch day.

]]> Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:32:23 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60496/#p60496 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60495/#p60495 NOW Jabber and GTalk are compatible, the merge has been done this morning wink

]]> Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:16:14 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60495/#p60495 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60250/#p60250 Hi everybody,

I'm french and I'm moderator on multy's forums and is there a french mod which can help you to add Google Talk to the profile :

http://multy.freezee.org/viewtopic.php?id=303

I've just test it on my computer and it's work... just replace "Skype" by "gtalk"

Enjoy wink

]]> Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:37:08 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60250/#p60250 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60241/#p60241 I do wink
You could merge AIM/ICQ though, since they both use the same network

]]> Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:48:41 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60241/#p60241 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60228/#p60228 It could easily replace the ICQ field, i haven't ran into anyone that uses ICQ for months.

]]> Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:01:47 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/60228/#p60228 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59731/#p59731 Because GTalk is a server based on the Jabber protocols
http://www.google.com/support/talk/bin/ … swer=23907
It uses the same protocols, but it isn't connected to the public Jabber networks

]]> Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:17:20 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59731/#p59731 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59727/#p59727 http://www.google.com/talk/otherclients.html - then why can you use the jabber part of all these clients to talk on google talk?

]]> Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:05:11 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59727/#p59727 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59702/#p59702 Connorhd wrote:
analogue wrote:
Connorhd wrote:

google talk IS jabber, so why not just use the jabber field?

No it's not, yet. Add a GTalk ID in a jabber client (on a jabber server) and you won't be able to talk to him.
Add a Jabber ID (on a jabber server) in GTalk, and you won't be able to talk to him.

Using the Jabber ID as a field for GTalk will only make jabber more confused in people's mind, and it's already one of the most confused IM protocol (not for geeks, but for common users).

Wrong. Jabber requires a server GTalk is simply 1 jabber server, (with a little extra for their voice support), unless i am very much mistaken.

I'm not wrong, do it yourself, try to talk to yourself between any jabber client and GTalk...
For now GTalk run on an incompatible network based on Jabber, and we don't know what will happen next, but as of now, they can't talk to each other.

]]> Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:49:30 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59702/#p59702 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59701/#p59701 analogue wrote:
Connorhd wrote:

google talk IS jabber, so why not just use the jabber field?

No it's not, yet. Add a GTalk ID in a jabber client (on a jabber server) and you won't be able to talk to him.
Add a Jabber ID (on a jabber server) in GTalk, and you won't be able to talk to him.

Using the Jabber ID as a field for GTalk will only make jabber more confused in people's mind, and it's already one of the most confused IM protocol (not for geeks, but for common users).

Wrong. Jabber requires a server GTalk is simply 1 jabber server, (with a little extra for their voice support), unless i am very much mistaken.

]]> Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:43:47 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59701/#p59701 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59673/#p59673 With the coming of group chat and video in GTalk, I'd like to know if the way IMs are handled in PunBB is going to change like this cool
http://www.glop.org/junk/im-selection.png

]]> Wed, 04 Jan 2006 23:04:23 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/59673/#p59673 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/51212/#p51212 saralk wrote:

I don't think googletalk fields should be added untill the service is at least out of beta, and it is in a state where enough people are actually using it, otherwise there would be arguments for every obscure IM client there is.

Oh, don't worry, it is widely used, a whole bunch of my contacts already switched, like me, and when I say switch, I say exclusively switch.
But I agree, it's hard to tell which might have the right to be included, hence my second proposition.

Connorhd wrote:

google talk IS jabber, so why not just use the jabber field?

No it's not, yet. Add a GTalk ID in a jabber client (on a jabber server) and you won't be able to talk to him.
Add a Jabber ID (on a jabber server) in GTalk, and you won't be able to talk to him.

Using the Jabber ID as a field for GTalk will only make jabber more confused in people's mind, and it's already one of the most confused IM protocol (not for geeks, but for common users).

]]> Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:13:33 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/51212/#p51212 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/51203/#p51203 google talk IS jabber, so why not just use the jabber field?

]]> Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:35:55 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/51203/#p51203 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/51198/#p51198 I don't think googletalk fields should be added untill the service is at least out of beta, and it is in a state where enough people are actually using it, otherwise there would be arguments for every obscure IM client there is.

]]> Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:25:58 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/51198/#p51198 <![CDATA[Re: Google Talk]]> https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/51166/#p51166 One idea would be to implement it in a dynamic way.
eg. a dynamic combobox for the IM service (listing ICQ, MSN, Jabber, ...). There is no need for it to be editable, it would just be easier for you to update it, and the profile would feel easier to complete for the common user.
And a textbox, like now, for the unique identifier.
Only one service could be used for an account, but I think that's ok as sooner or later there will be a need for interoperability (Gtalk started it wink )

That's what they do at Blogger:
http://www.glop.org/junk/im-selection.png

What do you think ?

]]> Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:26:31 +0000 https://punbb.informer.com/forums/post/51166/#p51166