Dr.Jeckyl: Why would they care if Rickard said that though? If there are enough topics on a specific piece of forum software, it's in their interest to create a forum for those topics. Other than just for the sake of being nice (which the TAZ people are), there's no incentive for them to not create a forum if they feel they should have one.
MattF wrote:That's a weird way of working it though. The fact they don't have a PunBB specific section means that they probably attract less PunBB admins than they would if they created the section. Or, on the other hand, why would existing members bother to list it if they know it's irrelevant, to a degree, on that particualr board.
Except it IS a choice in your profile and it IS a choice as a usergroup. Just not as a forum specifically for discussing PunBB topics 
Also, I think very few people go to TAZ just for forum software specific support. Thus, I don't know that having a PunBB forum would attract that many more users: it is, as they say, a case of demand. If there are enough users/topics that PunBB warrants its own forum, it would get one.
MattF wrote:Must admit, I could never understand why they don't have a PunBB section, when you look at what other forum softwares they have sections for, but that may just be my logic which thinks it's weird. 
That's part of the point. They were more lenient in the past and ended up with some inactive forums. So, they're more selective now.
