Email from punbb to outlook 2000 - l'éléphant aime les ç

me neither I used a friend to test

But many of my user yes ;(

The strange things is with Outlook 2000 you do a reply: all the text is well formated ... Tx $crosoft !

Have them sign up here and see if they have the same issue (I have Outlook 2002)?

Hi,

Strange it doesn't work me with outook 2003... Did i do something wrong ??

Ok no problem with this forum : the mail i got with outlook 2003 is perfectly formated

I've to check on my file if did something wrong with the function punbbmail(), but so far I don't think I ve touch anything there ...

I will let you know

What mail server are you using?

Qmail sure !

I recollect a known problem with a combination of php+qmail+outlook. Apparently Outlook would strip out linefeeds apart from Outlook XP which would add extra linefeeds. I think the solution was that Outlook required \n rather than \r\n even though it was technically incorrect.

Or is it something to do with this
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#cr

By the way where should i do the change ?
email.php

$message = str_replace("\n", "\r\n", pun_linebreaks($message));

or
function.php

function pun_linebreaks($str)
{
    return str_replace("\r", "\n", str_replace("\r\n", "\n", $str));
}

I did and so far is succesfull for outlook 2003, outlook express and one webmail (squirreMail)

in email.php I change

$message = str_replace("\n", "\r\n", pun_linebreaks($message));

by

$message = str_replace("\r\n", "\n", pun_linebreaks($message));

I know is not optimized but I wait for the feedback of the master: Rickard

I will chek with other mailers soon to know if the formatting is good for all of them

Tx

Thanks again

This modifications give good results for
- Outlook 2003
- Lotus note 6.5
- Outlook express
- SquirreMail (webmail)
- Feriepost (webmail)

There is still a problem with subject and special characters - they are replaced by ? with outlook 2003 and lotus note 6.5 (i just modify the title of the topics) to know how does it works here ...
This last point is not a big issue compare to the first (CRLF) one's.