Hey guys, the utility of this function is not the subject wink The subject is the possibility to bypass it. Maybe you don't see any utility to this function, personaly I do. We could discuss about it, but in an other subject plz ^^

By the way, it seams quite simple to fix this bug using html_entity_decode  () before checking the message.

Hi,

Just a little but, it's possible to write censored word using html equivalent for 1 or more letters of this word. Example, if fuck is censored, it's possible to write it using fuck. This is worst than invisible BCC code : using html code it's possible to write links (with invisible BCC code links are dead).


Notice : in order to write fuck (in my previous example), I used fuck, don't think without testing that html code don't work wink