1.2.x is great, thanks for the updates, and don't rush 1.3.x 
1 2006-06-03 08:26
Re: PunBB 1.2.12 (69 replies, posted in News)
2 2006-01-17 19:44
Re: Google Talk (16 replies, posted in Feature requests)
Bassguy wrote:
analogue wrote:NOW Jabber and GTalk are compatible, the merge has been done this morning
You could always use a jabber client to message with GTalk users, though. I ran it on my *nix box using Gaim on launch day.
... Geee, the Google XMPP network wasn't plugged to the Jabber XMPP network now it is. What you did was to use a XMPP client on the Google XMPP network, but you couldn't talk from a Google XMPP account to a Jabber XMPP account.
3 2006-01-17 19:16
Re: Google Talk (16 replies, posted in Feature requests)
NOW Jabber and GTalk are compatible, the merge has been done this morning
4 2006-01-05 11:49
Re: Google Talk (16 replies, posted in Feature requests)
Connorhd wrote:
analogue wrote:Connorhd wrote:google talk IS jabber, so why not just use the jabber field?
No it's not, yet. Add a GTalk ID in a jabber client (on a jabber server) and you won't be able to talk to him.
Add a Jabber ID (on a jabber server) in GTalk, and you won't be able to talk to him.Using the Jabber ID as a field for GTalk will only make jabber more confused in people's mind, and it's already one of the most confused IM protocol (not for geeks, but for common users).
Wrong. Jabber requires a server GTalk is simply 1 jabber server, (with a little extra for their voice support), unless i am very much mistaken.
I'm not wrong, do it yourself, try to talk to yourself between any jabber client and GTalk...
For now GTalk run on an incompatible network based on Jabber, and we don't know what will happen next, but as of now, they can't talk to each other.
5 2006-01-04 23:04
Re: Google Talk (16 replies, posted in Feature requests)
With the coming of group chat and video in GTalk, I'd like to know if the way IMs are handled in PunBB is going to change like this 
6 2005-11-25 00:02
Re: Edit time limit (25 replies, posted in Feature requests)
I also vote for an option to give a custom group the ability to edit their post for a short limited time (like 5 min).
Thanks
7 2005-11-01 01:19
Re: PunBB 1.2.10 (69 replies, posted in News)
In punbb-1.2.10-changed_files.zip the update file is 12_to_129_update.php. Need a fix ?
8 2005-10-23 03:42
Re: PunBB needs your money! (124 replies, posted in News)
My suggestions:
- pay your domain name for 10 years.
- pay your host for as long as you can.
9 2005-09-23 13:34
Re: PunBB 1.2.8 (67 replies, posted in News)
Thanks for all the versions ! Keep updating it and don't listen to the lazies
10 2005-09-07 15:13
Re: Google Talk (16 replies, posted in Feature requests)
saralk wrote:
I don't think googletalk fields should be added untill the service is at least out of beta, and it is in a state where enough people are actually using it, otherwise there would be arguments for every obscure IM client there is.
Oh, don't worry, it is widely used, a whole bunch of my contacts already switched, like me, and when I say switch, I say exclusively switch.
But I agree, it's hard to tell which might have the right to be included, hence my second proposition.
Connorhd wrote:
google talk IS jabber, so why not just use the jabber field?
No it's not, yet. Add a GTalk ID in a jabber client (on a jabber server) and you won't be able to talk to him.
Add a Jabber ID (on a jabber server) in GTalk, and you won't be able to talk to him.
Using the Jabber ID as a field for GTalk will only make jabber more confused in people's mind, and it's already one of the most confused IM protocol (not for geeks, but for common users).
11 2005-09-07 08:26
Re: Google Talk (16 replies, posted in Feature requests)
One idea would be to implement it in a dynamic way.
eg. a dynamic combobox for the IM service (listing ICQ, MSN, Jabber, ...). There is no need for it to be editable, it would just be easier for you to update it, and the profile would feel easier to complete for the common user.
And a textbox, like now, for the unique identifier.
Only one service could be used for an account, but I think that's ok as sooner or later there will be a need for interoperability (Gtalk started it )
That's what they do at Blogger:
What do you think ?
12 2005-09-06 05:15
Topic: Google Talk (16 replies, posted in Feature requests)
In Profile > Messaging, would be cool to have a Google Talk entry, unless you prefer to wait for a merge with Jabber.
13 2005-09-06 03:43
Re: The PunBB Newsletter (15 replies, posted in News)
I'm just using the RSS feed, but thanks
15 2005-04-26 03:47
Re: PunBB 1.2.5 (67 replies, posted in News)
I think you should wait for 1.2.6, it might not be this far away
16 2005-04-25 22:50
Re: Allow php requests inside posts (for admin only) (2 replies, posted in Feature requests)
Best secure way to do this would be to do a dynamic image in PHP displaying what you want, and inserting it in your sig.
Very bad idea to allow PHP/SQL code in a sig IMHO.
17 2005-04-09 05:43
Re: trouble with bbcode (11 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)
Rickard wrote:
It fixed it, thanks.
18 2005-04-08 16:49
Re: trouble with bbcode (11 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)
I encountered the same bug today.
I usually use the code tag to display some unparsed BB tag and I can't anymore.
You can reproduce the bug easily with this example:
Try to post this with the {} replaced by [], you can't anymore.
{code}Some code with some {code}code{/code} in it{/code}
19 2005-04-02 14:53
Re: HOWTO: Add more smilies (55 replies, posted in Feature requests)
555|STi wrote:
I did all you said but still can't make it work, the smilie still is 30x30
I'm quoting the FAQ:
To use non-15x15 pixel smilies, you must prevent PunBB from adding the width="15" and height="15" attributes to img tags. This can be done by editing include/parser.php in a text editor. Open up the file and search for:
width="15" height="15"
The text should be somewhere around line 260. Then replace the values with a width and height of your choice. If you want to use smilies of varying sizes, remove the attributes completely.
20 2005-03-02 19:45
Re: Question calendrier/agenda (4 replies, posted in Archive)
Ce qui est sur c'est qu'il ne fera pas partie du PunBB standalone.
21 2005-02-24 00:39
Re: punbb.fr (6 replies, posted in Archive)
vin100 wrote:
J'ai vu des message disant que "scinder la communauté" ne serait pas bon. Ce n'est pas ce que nous voulons faire, nous voulons travailler en partennariat avec Rickard et les sites anglophones.
Bonne initiative, seulement, comme pour les précédentes, il est préférable de ne pas être pressé et d'attendre quelques temps avant d'officialiser le tout comme pour les allemands. Vous aurez beau me répéter que la votre est la bonne, la bonne dizaine d'initiatives précédentes se sont toutes soldées par un échec.
Je suis sur que vous le comprendrez, une communauté, ca ne se demande pas, ca se crée toute seule
22 2005-02-19 13:06
Re: My operating system's forum (6 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 show off)
Cool, do you know about V2OS ? Do you aim for the same goal ?
23 2005-02-19 13:02
Re: Links open a new browser window (48 replies, posted in Feature requests)
I'm glad to see that more and more people understand why those target="" are wrong and useless 
Do a search on this forum or on google for other talks about it.
24 2005-02-10 20:25
Re: Avatar (2 replies, posted in Archive)
Il n'existe rien pour l'instant, mais ca a l'avantage d'éviter les images cassées ou les images trop grandes. Pas de mod à ma connaissance.
25 2005-02-09 06:16
Re: Problem with News Generator (18 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 modifications, plugins and integrations)
Nice wallpapers gregb !