That is why not catering to 1 group is the way to go (I do not think it is bad at all to separate one site's content from another by having one open in another window) and why I noted putting the option to choose in user preferences would be good to do so that people can decide on their own which way they want it to be.
You really aren't giving people the choice here to make their own decisions at all by restricting it to one of them (and the one far fewer sites use). I am well aware of the various arguments for and against opening a new window or not. If a user doesn't like Javascript playing around with the system, that user does have the option as well to turn it off and not have new windows open up at all (the same as such users can deactivate Flash capabilities of displaying or even just simply go to Lynx and have a text-based only interface if preferred).
Thanks btw for downplaying those who like separate content sites to open in a new Window as those with poor Windows skills by noting that only advanced Win32 users can appreciate links in the manner they are on this board. Just b/c I am lazy doesn't mean I don't know what I am doing in Windows or Linux, IE or Firefox nor that others who likewise prefer the logical separation of separate content by having a new Window open aren't advanced users either. Putting down 1 group to prove your point of what you prefer is not the way to convince others nor appropriate discourse for that matter.
Again, is there a reason that a choice between the 2 cannot be provided? You seem set to ensure only the one you like is used without giving an actual choice to people in user preferences or even considering that as a feedback item for a future capability.
Thanks.