1

(10 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 show off)

I like it, very nice.

It's up to you.
It depends how much importance you have for validation. It's very minor, and dosen't really affect the actual display of the page. I myself would just leave it as is, but then again I'm lazy sad

3

(0 replies, posted in Feature requests)

A nice feature to have will be so that when you click on a the date of the post ( to get a link to that post), the post you are linking to will be highlighed in some way. It can easily be done using only CSS:

DIV.blockpost:target { border-color: #FF0000 }

Note: Dosen't work in IE.

Richard wrote:

and those "Ones" would be?

Just random things I/friends/other people have worked on. None of those "major' forum softwares.
The current way censoring is set up, it's impossilbe to stop that bypassing. I didn't realize that censoring is done on the viewtopic.php page. It's not that big of a deal though imo.

Rickard wrote:

....but preventing anyone from doing so isn't as easy as it sounds.

PHP has an XML parsing function that does just that: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/ref.xml.php ^_~

Strange... Ones I've worked with had no problem with censored word bypassing.

Banned words: I'll use "fish" as an example. Doing the below will allow a user to post a banned word without it being censored:

fish

Breaking page validation: The following will make a page invalid:

This is a generic message with [b]bold and [i]bold-italic[/b] and italic text[/b]

Blank post: The following will let someone post a message with no viewable text in it:

I've tested all of the above on here, except for the banned word one, which I tested on my own comptuer.

Here is the topic: http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=5724
Sorry about the long string of WWWWW....WWWW, I was testing how it handled overflow. I may make you scroll a horizontally a bit.