Hi.
It has been decided for a while that we will wait until a final version of FluxBB is released (at least a beta or rc*) with a quite fixed language part and then we will make and release a localization as good as possible and do it the faster we can.
Why ?
What would happen if every one shares his own translation now ?
We would have to support many different versions and some users would probably use an "under development" software in a production environment (bad).
It's not that hard or that long to make** a (quick and dirty... (unfinished roll)) translation but it's a bit harder to make one which takes care of the ideas of, and is usable by many contributors/users.
We don't want to have many different official versions of the french localizations of FluxBB. We want the best localization possible.
If we release some unfinished translations, support will be requested, etc.
Remember, FuxBB 1.3.x is (at this time) for testing purpose only...

I think the rest of this story is mainly about  touchiness wink


But, uh... that's only the second lonely translator want to share his translation directly a ".org" rather than working with the existing community... ♪ what will be will be ♪

(funny to talk about fluxbb localization on punbb forum big_smile)


*of FluxBB (not the artificial PunBB one)...
**I did... but it was it was a long time ago... tongue

I think it useful to have only one url for a topic page..
Example: I wants to link Smartys' post (two posts above), I'd put the link http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=83950#p83950. It'll be taken for a new page by my browser (not for an anchor).

I've read about url rewriting but never about multiple urls for the same content...
I've not seen any change about id, pid, ect. when I tried the 1.3 dev version (svn) but it may have change since I did it because it was quite long ago...

The main interest of this topic is to inform the dev team of punBB 1.3 that there is a lake (or gap ?) in 1.2.x which should be filled in 1.3.
So, dear dev team, what do you think about this ? big_smile

5

(14 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

SourceForge downloads are working again now.. smile

You're welcome smile
Something else.. (just in case smile) It's impossible to loggout when banned..
This is just for information, I'm not complaining or asking for something wink.

Ok.. thanks smile
hmm...

8

(14 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Subversion: http://punbb.org/svn/punbb

I don't know where to post it, so...
There is a unlocalised text (Sort topics by) in line 281 of admin_forums (punbb 1.3 dev).

http://punbb.org/docs/dev.html#integration

Here are the forum rules:

Use common sense. Don't post anything you wouldn't want your mother to see. Also, don't post test posts in any other forum than the test forum.

But if it's a troll... I think there are troll slayers here tongue

12

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

eleven

13

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Honey (don't ask me why... big_smile)

14

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

soon

15

(17 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 show off)

Bah je ne sais pas.. c'est assez étonnant quand même.
Et puis, ça pourrait être spécifié, non ?

16

(17 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 show off)

Nemstudio wrote:

Il vous est interdit de le redistribuer

Heu... et la license GNU je-ne-sais-plus-quoi ?!?

binou wrote:

is it the one on puntal website ?

Yes, it is.
(But no, I'm not vin100 tongue)

18

(5 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 show off)

Brocken links... sad

19

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

dance

20

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

.                                                                                 Alabama                                                             (why ? why not smile)

21

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Shrek

22

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Art

23

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

corn

24

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

music

25

(5 replies, posted in General discussion)

Cute ? yikes