Search options (Page 2 of 16)

Well... there is a printable topic mod out threre. It outputs cleaner pages and all the posts in the same page.

Then you can use for example wget to get all the ages to your local computer.

If I really needed to do this i think the ultimate solution is to write a script that outputs all the data in whatever format you want. But that requires some programming knowledge.

Kick ass extensions!
Keep up.

You might also remove stage6 as it closed.

Now lets wait for some kind soul with javascript knoledge fixes a bbcode editor with these features.

It isn't bad?
It rocks!
good job.

Maybe targeting 1.3 instead wouldn't be so bad idea. The beta is already out.

I had this on a forum that i was running, but it is no longer online... sorry.
Those interested will have to try it by themselves for the time being

Keep in mind that this is an extension for punbb 1.2.x.
It hasn't been tested in 1.3..

?
is it me or those two lines of code are equal?

Ok, I red the 1.3 beta anouncement again, the demo extensions explain themselves.
Sorry, thought there was one.

you should defenately do that.
There's no point in having SEF urls in the admin interface. Keep it simple.

crop,

1. The number display format depends from country to country. For example, where I came from nobody really looks at 17,434 as seventeen thousand... It stands for seventeen 'point' ...
So I guess a goos solution would be give freedom to the admin to choose the display format, if this is not made yet.

2. Personally i think that will confuse the users more than it will help them. But that's my opinion. Anyway, I don't see a reason why this should come by default. Simply add it to your template if you really want.

3. Once again, i consider sub forums a huge mistake. It is a popular request though. Don't really know what to say about this one.

4. It doesn't make sense to have by default. A plugin should pop up whit that.

bingiman,

1. Absolutely. That would solve at least 95% of the spam problems. It's the most effective spam protection i know.

2. indeed.

3,4,5 - bahhh... punbb in not bloated software.

6. It needs database changes so i don't know about that. If it's not enabled by default i don't see how to implement it cleanly.

How will the styles be installed in 1.3?
Lets say a style has some template tweak, do one need to go and upload files to diferent folders?
It would be cool to be able to wrap styles in a folder, including theis specific templates.

supermag, I mean no offense with this, but i also got the impression you just heard about SEO and refered to it as if it would be a new thing to everybody else in here, when in fact there's quite a big amount of experienced webmasters and coders in here. Starting in the dev team.

The urls do matter. .htm, .html or no extension, I have never found a proof of any difference between any of those, but they are more SEF then using extensions like .php. Google publicly says it. There is a limit of indexed urls when they only difer in their querystring. So, yes, rewriting does matter. For those who insist that it doesn't, please read this before any repply
http://www.google.com/support/webmaster … topic=8522

Supermag, you might want to give a look at a SEO script i wrote for punbb
http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=14186

It features url-rewriting with meaningful urls, you can use it together with a tweaked topicview and you get the same effect as vbseo.
In fact I am curious, What's so special with vbseo?
So far you only pointed url rewriting, are we all forgetting punbb was the first forum software outputting clean valid XHTML?
I know a few stuff that could be changed in punbb's output that would help when it comes to seo. I can tell it latter, now I would really like to know what does VBSEO has that you think it's effective in terms of seo.

now, in repply to several posts in this topic... saying that content is the best SEO doesn't contribute with anything to this discussion, SEO is about getting the maximum out of a website content, not about touching the content itself. There's nothing wrong with SEO.
Also, another common mistake repeated a few times in here: having 100.000 indexed pages doesn't mean a website is SEF, at all. It's no use to have many indexed pages if they don't get visited anyway. I prefer to have 50 indexed pages but geting on the top of google for each page keywords.