1

(48 replies, posted in News)

MattF wrote:

It makes no difference whether it's labelled 1.3 or 2.0. It's not a pissing contest with other forum softwares. Primary number changes are normally used for a total rewrite, philosophy change, when you run out of .* numbers, or when you want to make people think it's a completely different beast. It still matters not a jot whatever the reason.

I didn't say anything about other scripts... Why would you even compare two scripts based on the version numbers?

The extension system is a pretty big feature addition. Even if it's not totally correct versioning-wise, I just thought that alone warranted a new major version number.

You could also argue that because PunBB's main philosophy is to let the user choose the features they want, with very few built-in, PunBB would never reach 2.0. So maybe the devs should decide their own rules for versioning.

2

(48 replies, posted in News)

Well I'm not sure I agree with a complete rewrite being required for a new version number, but Rickard did say this:

virtually every line of code and markup has been affected by the move to 1.3

3

(48 replies, posted in News)

Wouldn't this qualify to be 2.0? tongue

It works, sort of... The only problem I ran into was core.php was missing the handle_url_tag function.

Oh my god, I love you.

Now I just have to make it work with CodeIgniter...

6

(11 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

Legally, the copyright date cannot be updated unless the design/content has been updated. smile

7

(12 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

No, I'm not.

8

(12 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

Has anyone been able to recreate this? It seems like a pretty widespread bug.

9

(13 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

It looks like functions.php is being included more than once or something. Or maybe it's common.php that is being included more than once.

That's why I asked if you did any integrating.

10

(13 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

So you're not using any edited files or have done any sort of integrating with other scripts?

11

(3 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Thread controls are on the bottom-left of the page.

12

(10 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Ew, that's ugly.

13

(5 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

pogenwurst is correct. That is intentional.

More info on HTML entities:
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_entities.asp

14

(12 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

This is being done! That is the whole point of this thread!

15

(12 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

It's not mine but thanks for pointing those out.

EDIT: An index.php with Connorhd's Miniportal with poll.php included into it.

16

(12 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

Actually, on the two occasions it happened to me, I was trying to integrate PunBB with Plogger and this poll script.

17

(12 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

It looks as though many attempts at integrating PunBB with a php script (possibly only those with) are met with this error:

Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in blahblah

In every instance I've seen, the error points to a query with the $db object. Many people have stated that it appears that the $db object is not available globally, despite it being defined as global.

Some threads which addressed this problem to no avail:
http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=9883
http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=12287
http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=11545
http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=10207
(More if you search the forums for the error above)

Sorry if this has been fixed/posted before but I didn't see it anywhere.

There are at least a few snippets of code on the forums that do this. Try searching for it.

quaker wrote:

ok let me know how it goes.. im looking for a gallery that will do that.
each member have there own thingy bob...lol..

Oh that kind of gallery. No, I don't think Plogger can do that. hmm

Haven't integrated it just yet.

I use Plogger for a gallery.

Hmm. I seem to get this error when I use this script with this one: http://www.phpfront.com/fpoll.php

Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /home/hl2land/public_html/ortz/index.php on line 30

(Line 30 is the first query)

pogenwurst wrote:
ortzinator wrote:

you can't put php in the templates

Actually, by using pun_include (see the docs), you can, but obviously the work is already done, so just keep that in mind for the future.

Yes, I know. That wouldn't work for what I was doing. smile

24

(4 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

It's CAPTCHA not CAPTHA. smile

Okay thanks guys. I eventually got away from PunBB's template system and just did everything manually since I needed to do a lot of php inbetween and you can't put php in the templates.