1

(23 replies, posted in Development)

Ok, good point. Sorry, I did not really check the exact placement of that string.

Good luck.

2

(23 replies, posted in Development)

Why did you remove the FluxBB copyright part?

3

(17 replies, posted in News)

Good smile

4

(17 replies, posted in News)

Quote from the original vulnerability report:

[Time-line]

20/08/2011 - Vendor notified
02/09/2011 - No e-mail reply and BAN on Forum
???        - Vendor patch release
16/09/2011 - Public disclosure

Please tell me this is not true!

P.S.: You should also mention that people should definitely upgrade to keep their members and other internet users secure!

5

(3 replies, posted in PunBB 1.3 discussion)

Grez wrote:

There were quite a few changes from Informer's team (support for InnoDB...), so it's not only by the new team  wink

Or rather the FluxBB team tongue

6

(28 replies, posted in Feature requests)

colak wrote:
fantasma wrote:

fluxbb have extension system....

Unfortunately not

...not yet wink

This was one of the reasons for the fork, remember?

8

(8 replies, posted in Discussions)

KeyDog wrote:

But they're both fast.

+1 smile

9

(8 replies, posted in Discussions)

Well, 1.3 was - in a way - based on the 1.2 core and until you give me a good benchmark, there is absolutely no reason to believe 1.3 should be faster than 1.4.

Yes, of course, both of them are slower than 1.2 when run on the same machine.

Note that this is not supposed to turn into some kind of dogfight, I was just wondering where you got that idea from.

10

(8 replies, posted in Discussions)

KeyDog wrote:

I believe FluxBB is slower than PunBB since 1.4.2.

Sorry, why would you think that? FluxBB 1.4 is based on PunBB/FluxBB 1.2.
Both should be faster than 1.3, due to the latter's extension system.

Nontheless, if one-click extensions are more important for you than installing modifications by hand, PunBB is probably the way to go (for now).

11

(4 replies, posted in Discussions)

Hey PunBB team,

as the actual core development seems to be rather low-paced, I'd be interested to hear what are your plans for future PunBB development? Is 2.0 development under way? After all, it is mentioned on the roadmap in your wiki...

Use

define('FORUM_DISABLE_CSRF_CONFIRM', 1);

See wiki...

I wrote an article about integrating FluxBB with WordPress (design-wise). For anyone interested: http://www.develophp.org/2010/05/23/int … te-part-1/

14

(2 replies, posted in General discussion)

I suggest you go to punbb-hosting.com and e-mail Smartys, the owner of the software. I'm sure he'll be able to help you... it's not the first time this has happened...

http://fluxbb.info/

It's FluxBB, but you get your subdomain...

16

(17 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

Uhmmm... somewhat (totally) off-topic:

Why can I see Rickard's IP as 127.0.0.1 as a guest???

Not quite. But I created an extension "deleted posts log". works like a trashcan, if that helps...

18

(58 replies, posted in PunBB.NET discussion)

Your demo does not work.

19

(3 replies, posted in PunBB 1.3 bug reports)

kaptainkory wrote:

Oxygen.css ->

Around line 139

#brd-redirect, #brd-maint, #brd-util {
    margin: 50px auto 12px auto;
    width: 60%;
    }

Shouldn't it be "#brd-main" instead?

No, that's the maintenance mode message.

Somewhere in the administration panel, there should be an option to automatically be notified of new posts... that's a lot of e-mail though...

21

(2 replies, posted in Discussions)

I guess you shouldn't call yourself the "official" support for PunBB in Spanish...

22

(10 replies, posted in PunBB 1.3 extensions)

homepage -> official extensions ... tongue

You're not supposed to put HTML code in your messages anyway, since that would allow malicious scripts to be inserted...

"Bad request. The link you followed is incorrect or outdated."

25

(4 replies, posted in PunBB 1.3 additions)

Why did you hide the "Powered by PunBB" link?