Topic: .
.
1 2004-12-10 05:03 (edited by Rewozz 2009-08-02 18:46)
- Connorhd
- Former PunBB Developer
- Offline
Re: .
http://midplay.net/ - really really messed uyp in firefox, but looks cool in IE
Re: .
Connorhd wrote:
really really messed uyp in firefox, but looks cool in IE
Fine in Safari (mac)
New Friendly web-shop! • SO happy with PunBB! • Now punBB 1.4.x on ALL forums (won't tell how many or their addresses to avoid spam-regs)
4 2004-12-15 15:20 (edited by Penfold 2004-12-15 15:21)
Re: .
Rewozz wrote:
Firefox interprets css differently than IE, and I think that sucks.
Firefox interprets CSS according to the specification and recommendations set out by the W3C. IE interprets CSS in its own rather peculiar manner.
Code first for Firefox (or any of the Gecko based browsers) and then fix/hack your CSS for IE if necessary 
.
Re: .
And then remember that Firefox/Moz is braindead when it comes to calculating dimensions in anything other than pixels (the rendering engine has a really inconvenient rounding problem) and has a major bug when it comes to clearing floats.
EDIT:
<span class="bold">News</span><br> <br>
You have to be joking
<h2>News</h2>
H2 {FONT-SIZE: whatever; MARGIN: 0 0 whatever 0}
Nothing else needed; same for all the others.
Re: .
And it's not <br><br> but ... <br /><br /> (if you want your site is according to xhtml)
Re: .
Rod wrote:
And it's not <br><br> but ... <br /><br /> (if you want your site is according to xhtml)
you dont need <br /> to be valid, i dont have thoes on my main page, and its valid
Re: .
Gizzmo: Your main page is HTML 4.01 transitional not XHTML so just about anything will validate.
Re: .
oh sorry
Re: .
It shouldn't even have one <br />
Have a read of this:
http://tantek.com/log/2002/10.html#L20021022t1432
(a few other good links in there as well.) My site is now 95% clear or <b> <br /> etc. Still tweaking to get it further semantically correct.