1 (edited by chacmool 2003-12-29 01:44)

Topic: Image in signatures

What about making them into url's instead?

And maybe use the text "[image]" instead of "http://www.somedomain.com/~user/pics/coolimage.jpg"?

Re: Image in signatures

Do you mean when the img tag is disabled in signatures?

"Programming is like sex: one mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life."

3 (edited by chacmool 2003-12-29 01:50)

Re: Image in signatures

Kennel wrote:

Do you mean when the img tag is disabled in signatures?

Yes, instead of the [img]-tags.

Edit: I think it looks kinda weird having "un-parsed" bb-code in the signature...

Re: Image in signatures

True. I'll add it to the list.

"Programming is like sex: one mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life."

5 (edited by chacmool 2003-12-29 01:55)

Re: Image in signatures

Great!

More stuff on the todo-list though wink

Edit: ...or maybe [coolimage.jpg] instead of "http://www.somedomain.com/~user/pics/coolimage.jpg"...

Re: Image in signatures

I'm gonna wait a while with this one. I'm not sure I want it like that. Admins like the ability to disable parsing of img tags in signatures not only because it stops people from putting large images in their signatures, but because it makes life a little easier for the server.

"Programming is like sex: one mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life."