You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics
Search options (Page 170 of 307)
Topics by Smartys User defined search
Posts found: 4,226 to 4,250 of 7,674
grudon66 wrote:Smartys wrote:grudon66: I would suggest you stick with 1.2 for the time being.
To answer your question though, you need to run the db_update.php script when upgrading a forum.
And the error when i click on upgrade: Fatal error: Call to undefined method DBLayer::table_exists() in C:\Documents and Settings\Hemen.GHADERI\Desktop\dc\www\punbb\db_update.php on line 120
As I said, I'd suggest you stick with 1.2. That being said, you need to ensure that you have replaced all of your files with their updated copies:
I don't know how useful it would be (or how much of a mess the output would be for some OSes). Also, how useful is that information for the average forum admin? I think if you need it in your case, you would be better off just adding it in
When it's finished
grudon66: I would suggest you stick with 1.2 for the time being.
To answer your question though, you need to run the db_update.php script when upgrading a forum.
That's what he meant
A long long time ago for another project
Aha: I never had any issue opening .tpl files with Dreamweaver
I've edited your subject to reduce the amount of caps and clarify the issue
If you want to edit the .tpl files, simply open them in any text editor: I don't know why Dreamhost has an issue opening a plain text file
MyPunBB doesn't use a different set of tables for each forum
Moved to Modifications
Yes, raising the max file size limit would hide the issue (until someone tried uploading a file bigger than the limit). I'm still finding that warning to be not very well documented
The header.php warnings are due to the warning at the top
I'm not sure why you're getting that warning though: it shouldn't be possible to exceed the MAX_FILE_SIZE setting
You're missing the file indicated in the error: make sure you uploaded it
I've edited your topic's title to more accurately reflect the issue
It is however simple. Bots are useful but very curious. I do not wish that Google keeps in its cache the data of userlist, profiles of members and contents of posts.
So, you would serve up different versions of the page to the search bots? Search engines generally don't like that: if you just don't want Google, etc to cache the contents of your pages, use the noarchive meta tag
Jérémie: Take a look at PunRes's most popular projects:
* 1. Private Messaging System 1.2.x
* 2. PBB Gallery
* 3. Calendar
* 4. PunDokuWiki
* 5. Easy BBCode
* 6. Attachment Mod for PunBB 1.2.*
* 7. Easy Poll
* 8. PBB ChatBox
* 9. Reputation mod
* 10. Frontpage PunBB
I'd say that the modifications you mentioned are interesting but not necessarily top priority: there are other mods with much greater demand
teenagegluesniffer wrote:guardian34 wrote:teenagegluesniffer wrote:I'm asking how it's encrypted, and how to incorporate the decrypt/encrypt it into my new profiles because I can currently only acquire the encrypted password.
So, you want to add password-changing functionality to this new profile page you're creating?
Yes.
OK, PunBB has that functionality in profile.php already: take a look at it
As for where pun_hash is, it's where all the functions are: include/functions.php
Fair enough
Out of curiosity, why would you want to let regular guests access some forums but not let Google? I would think that it would be to your benefit to let Google read the forums that you let your guests read
He will put it in when he has the time to work on it, he has plenty of work to do other than rewriting the DB plugin so it works with MyPunBB's unique setup
Moved to Modifications
Why not just use robots.txt?
I have no idea what you want to do, but changing the password for a user in the database to something that pun_hash doesn't compute should break logins. What's confusing about it?
Until Connor puts the database management plugin back in, there isn't a way for you to move your information
I'm not exactly sure what you want to know
Are you asking how is the password encrypted in the database? If so, take a look at the pun_hash function
hcgtv wrote:Ulph wrote:Maybe a few commonly used extensions could be "officially supported" now that the dev team has such an abundance of members?
I believe that's the plan, I just don't know at this point which plugins will become official extensions.
Well, at the very least we'll have the PM extension
Posts found: 4,226 to 4,250 of 7,674