6,351

(8 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

Now, you could use o_base_url to make it an absolute path instead wink

6,352

(8 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

No, it wouldn't
Say I have forums.punbb.org and punbb.org
forums.punbb.org is in /home/rickard/forum/ and punbb.org is in /home/rickard/site/
forums.punbb.org has the PunBB install. If I try and integrate it with punbb.org, PUN_ROOT would be ../forum/, which would screw everything up tongue

You can't just embed a page within another page: search.php is its own seperate HTML document.
I would suggest using an iframe instead

6,354

(4 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

http://www.punres.org/viewtopic.php?id=321

6,355

(4 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

That's how it's supposed to work. Things aren't marked as read immediately just because you read them: you need to install a mod to add that functionality (or wait for 1.3, which will have it)

6,356

(3 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

Well, look at this forum:
http://punbb.org/forums/viewforum.php?id=22
ie:   Moved: mypunbb forums aren't working??? by Scizzle

Those are redirect topics. They redirect to the real topics, which are in their new forums (in this case, General discussion)

· mypunbb forums aren't working??? by Scizzle

6,357

(3 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

Is this a redirect topic?

6,358

(5 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

There have been longer "dry spells" than that, I wouldn't be worried

6,359

(2 replies, posted in General discussion)

ShadowHawk wrote:

btw - When's the last time you did a google search for anything with the letters "php" in the search terms?  They now give an error message, telling you that there's a virus on your machine....  Go figure....  Google's getting as bad as MS.

No they don't...
The only time I get that error is searching for "powered by phpbb 2.0.*" where * is any number
Or inurl:viewtopic.php wink

6,360

(9 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

It is valid: check the actual code itself tongue
It's a mistake in the validator wink

PunBB doesn't require javascript to work properly
Let me test this...

Edit: My browser is indeed set like that, and PunBB works 100% as it's supposed to. I can login, etc
Those functions aren't required, they're simply performed when the form is submitted: it makes no difference if they happen or not

6,362

(1 replies, posted in General discussion)

There's a closing script tag there that isn't needed, you have 2 body tags, you put a mailto link outside the proper HTML (that wouldn't cause the issue, it's just wrong though), and I think <script> uses type="text/javascript", not language

If you mean the function, check_cookie() in functions.php

6,364

(36 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

It does smile

6,365

(36 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

I actually wrote a mod for multiple groups (and considering I wrote it in < 1 day while I was half asleep, it worked surprisingly well). I don't think I have the code still, but all it took was an extra table (user_groups) that had 3 columns: user_id, group_id, and primary. Your "primary" group was the one used for non-forum permissions stuff and all the groups were used to determine forum permissions

It did require a rewrite of most permission checking functionality wink

I'm not sure about the posts, but "not converting the passwords" means that your users will all have to use the "Forgot your password" option to get assigned new passwords

2 things you'd have to do:
1. Write a new abstraction layer for Oracle
2. Find the places where the query syntax is different and add in an oracle case

6,368

(4 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=49746#p49746
http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=50060#p50060
http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=52967#p52967
http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=56219#p56219

Yes, all same topic tongue

6,369

(4 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 bug reports)

The issue is double entries in the online table: this has been reported many times before wink

Enable debug mode
and post the full error

If the timezone on the server (without any of the PunBB stuff interfering) is CET, then PunBB's server timezone should be set as CET. That means the forum clock, by itself, is GMT. Then, you pick the appropriate offset on a per-user level. So you'd pick CET for yourself as well.

6,372

(3 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Not a bug, that's the intended behavior wink
It's to keep people from deciding to re-register to get around a ban on a username

The board timezone is supposed to be set so that the other timezones are correct (so, if the default time on the server is CET, I choose the CET timezone, so the forum time is GMT). Then, each individual user has their own setting

6,374

(4 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

You actually tested the query? Wow, you're more careful than me tongue

6,375

(4 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Mmm, in the join, shouldn't p.id be p.topic_id?