Looks "fixed" to me, you have a new error now. wink

My code is not publicly available, but I am willing to answer questions wink
Each forum could potentially have its own database (they don't right now because of the constraints of my host: I probably will move to that system in the future with a new host). Each forum can upload its own stylesheets and have its own templates. I don't do image hosting for them and I don't set up domains (although I could move to a subdomain setup in the future).
The way I got around your problem with links was to make all the links www.punbb-hosting.com/forums/forumname/ and had Apache rewrite that to a link to the actual codebase with ?m=forumname wink

Now that doesn't make sense, for two reasons:
1. $this->query_result should be a resource, that's what the if statement is for.
2. According to the documentation for mysql_free_result, you should only see a warning.
3. Using the @ should suppress any error you might see anyway.

Try changing if ($this->query_result) to if (is_resource($this->query_result))

This sounds like exactly the approach I took with PunBB-Hosting wink

Could you paste your code at around that line?

2,256

(9 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Show your administrator the output of the EXPLAIN statement and ask them to explain how it's the query's problem. wink
And post the response if they still insist it is, I would be interested to hear the justification.

2,257

(9 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

No, I don't. It returns one row of information. The issue is your server, not the query.

2,258

(9 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

That's a MySQL server issue, not a query issue wink

2,259

(9 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Smartys wrote:

I would run an EXPLAIN on the query and see if anything looks wrong with it. If not, I would guess that the issue is with the MySQL server

Without that data, there's no way to determine what, if anything, needs to be tweaked.

2,260

(5 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

yemgi wrote:

you can empty these 3 tables, if you empty the database, you will lose everything

If you empty those 3 tables then searching will not work wink

2,261

(19 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Smilies look fine to me. Do you have them disabled in your profile?

So, why not just use my code and modify it to suit your needs? tongue

Download a fresh copy of PunBB and look in there smile

Tunox wrote:

Smartys: ??

Tunox wrote:

Satay method will be coming as soon as I have at least the flash showing up

You don't need to use the satay method to have it working using the information on that page.

2,265

(11 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Drop me an email, I'll be more than happy to take a look at it wink

http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay

2,267

(2 replies, posted in Programming)

If you wanted to always be able to see if guests can read, yes, you would need an extra query.

2,268

(27 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Mmm, could you paste the error from your error_log?

That's a header added by your host, not PunBB.
Do you have a file named activate_password.tpl in the mail_templates folder of the default language for your forum? If so, is the file blank?

You would have to modify the PunBB code.

2,271

(27 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Database changes can and do happen, but the db_update.php file should be a welcome change. Just copy it from the extras directory, run it, and your database should be brought up to date. I say should because especially with the SVN copies there might be small bugs that are later corrected.

As for the mod_rewrite stuff, could you give some specific examples? We know that it isn't working 100% yet, I'm just curious how it's working for you so far smile

2,272

(27 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

That's what I use, so I'm not sure what the problem is (plus, it's certainly not serving up different content for different people)

http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=15963
Is this relevant?

2,273

(1 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

First off, it's PunBB 1.3, not PunBB 3 wink
Second off, considering the code is not yet even in an alpha testing stage, this is very premature criticism. If I were you, I would wait until we actually release it as a download before you evaluate it wink
Third off, that is static HTML generated from an old copy of PunBB 1.3 from SVN. It is, by my guess, at least several months old. The back to top links, for example, no longer exist.

On that note, I'm closing this topic. If you would like to write another evaluation, as premature as it would be, feel free to do so. Please, however, make sure that you're using the latest version from SVN and not one several months old.

2,274

(27 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

The HTML/CSS has been redone, a lot of code has been modified. I'd say that by the time 1.3 is released, most lines of code will have been modified at least once.

2,275

(27 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Namaless wrote:

Yes, but I have tested 1.3-dev and works perfectly.. For me added small features in additional and the result is wonderfull bulletin board wink

That's nice of you to say, but it still isn't finished yet tongue