Search options (Page 43 of 54)

millions

looks good,
but I'm going to stick with the "good 'ol ones" ... partly because it looks like someone has a flashlight shining on them from below, and also I like the 'simpleness' and consistency on the normal ones ... (normally in all computerstuff the icons, buttons etc. is lit from top/top-left)
but for those that want a bit more flashy, I think they'll like these

it has been discussed, see this topic

Not much more than I get on my hotmail account I use almost everywhere (the mail I have here is a forwarder to my hotmail) ... and I have had this email for more than 2-3 years ... had a spam peak half a year ago(a total of 20 mails over 1½ week), but I forwarded a few to abuse@ISP ... and now I have usually fewer than 2 per week ... and I have done alot of "bad stuff" with that email ... some of the 'unsubscribe from spam list' things really seems to work ... but there are rumors that these is a 'confirmation' thingie

But I guess you wouldn't mind people trying

Well I just had to put this into the discussion ... that the cloak isn't "safe", nothing displayed on internet is safe, it can be abused ... just perhaps "safer" for some kind of spam bots, than with clear text ... as you say ... there's billions of emails ... so they first need to aim the bot at the right forum first

Whatever Rickard choose to do ... there's always a possibility to add a mod to add some JavaScript

well .. it's wiki, everyone can edit, so it's a risk you have with most of them ... (but you can lock pages if you want)

so, what are the proofs that using javascript really 'disables' the spambots?

I would never ever publicate an email adress of mine on the internet if I never want spam in that...  I have one account that I use for non spam issues (employment contacts etc.), and a few that I have publically avaible, where I'm aware that I might get it spammed to death ...

but, I don't see why one javascript would make is "safe" ... safety is more or less just a time issue IMHO ... how long will it take for those that can 'sense' that this kind of javascript is in action, and still parse the email adresses? I don't think too long... as spammers make money, and they want to get new fresh mails ... and when parsing... it's easy to find that javascript ...

IMHO, there's only one way to be "safe" from spam, and that's not to show the mail in any way...

looks good, and CodeDuck has a point, I would say that you should have helptexts to say what happens if you check a box, everywhere, also on the 'toggle' .... or use toggle everywhere

Enable this if you want to see images in signatures...
Enable this to see users avatar images at their posts.
Enable this to open links in new windows.

I think it was meant as a feature request, to be added to future versions of punbb

You have indexes that take up space aswell ... looks like this for me

Space usage :
Type     Usage
Data     2,028     KB
Index     3,842     KB
Total     5,870     KB

that is ... the index is bigger than the two ints and the tiny ...

I zapped that post ... heh ... by some odd reason

I must say I agree with your first post Rickard, about the images.
What I wouldn't mind to see is also the signature on/one/off option (on and off I don't explain, but the one means that each users sig is only shown once per page, only need a small array to keep the viewed userid's, shouldn't take that much cpu time to use it)
This is also due to the thing that many people have very annoying signatures, huge colorful with irritating colors etc ....

just a suggestion, while we're in those sections anyway (I didn't see it up there, but if I did I'm sorry for having missed it )