1

(0 replies, posted in General discussion)

http://profile.zc923.homeip.net
In Firefox, the links in the post work. In IE, it treats the the links as regular text.
After a bit of tweaking, I found it to be a div tag in the index file of the template.

<div class="entry">

Even If I put a </div> directly following this, the links still do not work. Its not even a css issue. The only way I can get it to work is to remove the code itself.

I swear, when I modified the template, it worked. The only reason I found out of the problem was when a frequent visitor told me the links in the post no longer worked. The code had remained unchanged since then.

Any one have suggestions?

I hate this.

2 seconds after posting, I tried something and it worked.

<?php 
get_header();
?>

<?php if (have_posts()) : while (have_posts()) : the_post(); ?>
<div class="entry">

With the code line in the header was

<div id="main">

I removed the main div from the header, and placed it like this:

<?php 
get_header();
?>

<?php if (have_posts()) : while (have_posts()) : the_post(); ?>
<div id="main">
    <div class="entry">

It works now, But pushes the sidepbar all the way to the bottom of the page in both browsers.

Isolation of the problem even further,

<?php 
get_header();
?>
<div id="main">
<?php if (have_posts()) : while (have_posts()) : the_post(); ?>

    <div class="entry">

This places the side bar correctly, but links don't work in ie.


EDIT: Ignore everything. Apperantly, IE does not like negative margins. The div tags had nothing to do with the problem. Still, why would IE suddenly stop accepting something it accepted earlier?

2

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Gemini

3

(5 replies, posted in General discussion)

MY EYES!!
http://glennferon.com.nyud.net:8090/por … lio05.html
THEY BURN!

4

(15 replies, posted in General discussion)

deerchao wrote:

no one knows this is from www.csszengarden.com?

see this: http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/1 … amp;page=0

You actually stumbled on to my next project there...
I was trying to combine that style with wordpress.
I should remove my test site link.
Please use this link: http://thewronglane.zc923.homeip.net/

Check the template file that displays the header.

6

(101 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

zaqaz wrote:

For now I protected admin_* files via apache basic auth in .htaccess, hope it kick out some kiddies.

Thats a brilliant idea. Sure, it adds an extra password prompt, but for punbb sites that only have 1 admin and a couple of moderators, this could be the ultimate way to keep out these so called "hackers". The eaiset way I see is having all of the admin files in a seperate directory, protected by an .htaccess file with an .htpasswd file located in a non public directory. That way, if these "hackers" are able to run an exploit that gives them admin access, they can't do anything because of the protected admin section.

7

(15 replies, posted in General discussion)

I'm going to do some shameless self promotion now that I have the style that I like and works well.
The Wrong Lane
Please look through the site, read the articles. Most of them are posted by me, mostly because the site is fairly new and I'm trying to generate articles about every 2 weeks. If you see a problem, leave a comment or email me zereod [at] gmail [dot] com. If you like what you read, tell others. I don't expect this to be big, but none the less, I would like some people to read it.

Dosen't google base its ads on content found on the page it is being displayed on? If so, then you are browsing a site that has sweedish somewhere on the domain, google will put up sweedish ads.

9

(101 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

There must be some unforseen variables that are allowing acess to thes scriptkiddies. Maybe certain mods/plugins could leave a door open? Or possibly, server varaiables? I would think that fourms.punbb.org would be the main target to take down, seeing it is one of the largest punbb forums, and also most recognized (as each instance of punbb forums linkes to this board). Because they have not bothered with this site, there must be something that Rickard has done that the others have not. As code xp pointed out, its not limited to old versions.

10

(12 replies, posted in General discussion)

Windows Vista:Windows XP::Windows 98 SE:Windows 98
In other words, Vista should be known as xp second edition. It was promised to offer great, new things, but of course, microsoft goofed.

With all do respect, no politicaly motivated online community will be unbiased. You want to have moderators who have some inkling into the subjects being discussed; however, most people adept enough to fill the shoes are not exactly the most fare and balanced people. Politics these days are a nasty subject because very few people take the middle road. You have your "god fearing" conservatives on one side, and "civil liberity hippies" on the other. The society we live in forces people to be sided with one or the other.

Do give you an idea of the moderators I am talking about, try shifting through the myspace.com (which, I should note, was recently bought by Rupert Murdock, the FOX news Mogul) political fourms.

12

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

fat food

13

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

brine

14

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Tom Sawyer

15

(15 replies, posted in General discussion)

Actually Rod, you have a problem if you use the scroll wheel on the mouse. The background moves. Try setting the background image to fixed.

16

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

damn small linux

17

(15 replies, posted in General discussion)

Rod, your page is completly screwy in FireFox.

18

(15 replies, posted in General discussion)

I got tired of that frame fake theme, came up with a new one.
Any Suggestions? Comments? Problems?

19

(6 replies, posted in General discussion)

The eaiset thing to do would make a white border around each letter, that way it looks the way it should no matter what background.

20

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Nat
(read: network address translation)

21

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Mr. Bean

22

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Mummy

23

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Freddie Mercury

24

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Levi

Well, I know that sendmail is enabled, because I can send email locally (localhost). But I can't get out of the network onto a wan. Could it be a router issue?