301

(1 replies, posted in Programming)

Administration > Permissions

Just a note: Anyone that posts in these forums are usually looking for help. Imagine if everyone's subject heading said HELP. You may want to think about that the next time you are looking for assistance.

Bingiman

302

(3 replies, posted in General discussion)

lol - That's too funny.

@TuxPirate - Well, that's actually a compliment. I made the theme. Props to me..:D

304

(5 replies, posted in General discussion)

You will get that because you're using the same id's twice. In order to avoid that issue have a look at the following thread:

http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=17237

Hope this helps. I did it and it worked great.

305

(16 replies, posted in General discussion)

Nice...I would like that mod.

306

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

ok, thanks Matt. I was just curious.

307

(21 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Place it in your style_cs.css file

308

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

Could this be the reason why my site does not validate? I am no expert. I am just wondering.

Unable to check for upgrade since 'allow_url_fopen' is disabled on this system.

309

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

ok, thanks.

310

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

hmm..I am using Outlook and I have no issues with sending mail to anyone else..Well, I'll wait to see if he received the last one via MSN

311

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

I'll try it on MSN via IE. Let me know if you receive it.

312

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

Actual return message:

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

       smartys@punbb.org

message headers.

X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Z3TmmkSEdPtWvQP47sSZYmyVDNftcFVjIkkVChcI7Z2tX38IqqsyOk=
Received: from tomts26-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.189]) by bay0-pamc1-f3.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444);
     Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:40:05 -0800
Received: from toip42.srvr.bell.ca ([67.69.240.43])
          by tomts26-srv.bellnexxia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP
          id <20071124004004.IAMA1657.tomts26-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip42.srvr.bell.ca>
          for <shedrock@sympatico.ca>; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:40:04 -0500
Received: from toip19.srvr.bell.ca ([67.69.240.21])
  by toip42.srvr.bell.ca with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2007 19:40:02 -0500
Received: from bay0-omc2-s19.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.155])
  by toip19.srvr.bell.ca with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2007 19:40:02 -0500
From: postmaster@mail.hotmail.com
To: shedrock@sympatico.ca
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:40:01 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
    boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C82C967268DA90000C16A4bay0?omc2?s19.ba"
X-DSNContext: 7ce717b1 - 1196 - 00000002 - 00000000
Message-ID: <hh6nB2J4X0005a4b7@bay0-omc2-s19.bay0.hotmail.com>
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Return-Path: <>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2007 00:40:05.0362 (UTC) FILETIME=[8E795D20:01C82E32]

313

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

rejected again.

314

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

well I used your name at punbb.org and it rejected it. I will try again.

315

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

316

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

I sent it. big_smile

Cheers!

317

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

You did? It is a new host that I signed up with. I find them much faster than the other hosts that I currently have. Hmm..that's odd. 19 Queries, but then again all the other pun sites I run are more or less the same.

318

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

Well, it is not public. how can I contact you to give you the site URL?

319

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

I checked and rechecked. This is definitely a problem on my new site. If I don't visit the site for a while and then click on the link to validate I get those 3 errors. I also did it with my other 3 sites over and over and I never get the problem. It is only happening with the new site.

320

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

yeah, that's what I always do actually. Oh well, I'll keep an eye on it and try not obsessing over it. big_smile

Thanks Matt.

321

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

Well, that's the strange thing. All my other websites work on the first go. It is only the new site that has this problem. I wonder if it could be the new host that I am on now.

http://lorkan.com - http://shednotes.com and http://shedrockonline.com - weird..

I am having a strange problem and I don't know why it is happening.

On my new site when I click the http://validator.w3.org/referrer the site comes up with the following errors. It also says that there is no valid stylesheet. I know my site is XHTML 1.0 Strict! and my css files are in perfect. however, if I click the link again it shows up as valid and everything is normal. Could this also have something to do with the new changes to pun 1.2.16? 

# Line 1, Column 0: no document type declaration; implying "<!DOCTYPE HTML SYSTEM>".

<HTML><HEAD><META HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh" CONTENT="0.1; URL=/">

?

The checked page did not contain a document type ("DOCTYPE") declaration. The Validator has tried to validate with a fallback DTD, but this is quite likely to be incorrect and will generate a large number of incorrect error messages. It is highly recommended that you insert the proper DOCTYPE declaration in your document -- instructions for doing this are given above -- and it is necessary to have this declaration before the page can be declared to be valid.
# Error Line 4, Column 6: end tag for "HEAD" which is not finished.

</HEAD></HTML>

?

Most likely, you nested tags and closed them in the wrong order. For example <p><em>...</p> is not acceptable, as <em> must be closed before <p>. Acceptable nesting is: <p><em>...</em></p>

Another possibility is that you used an element which requires a child element that you did not include. Hence the parent element is "not finished", not complete. For instance, in HTML the <head> element must contain a <title> child element, lists (ul, ol, dl) require list items (li, or dt, dd), and so on.
# Error Line 4, Column 13: end tag for "HTML" which is not finished.

</HEAD></HTML>

?

Most likely, you nested tags and closed them in the wrong order. For example <p><em>...</p> is not acceptable, as <em> must be closed before <p>. Acceptable nesting is: <p><em>...</em></p>

Another possibility is that you used an element which requires a child element that you did not include. Hence the parent element is "not finished", not complete. For instance, in HTML the <head> element must contain a <title> child element, lists (ul, ol, dl) require list items (li, or dt, dd), and so on.

Bingiman

Try this:

[url=http://wcradio.com/][img]http://www.thechaosarmy.org/img/wowradio.jpg[/img][/url]

Hi Matt,

You need to edit the code above you have an extra ")" on the following line:

        $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] = $pun_config['o_base_url'].'/'.basename(isset($_SERVER['PHP_SELF']) ? $_SERVER['PHP_SELF'] : '').'?'.(isset($_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']) ? $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING'] : ''));

Thanks guys, it works great now.

325

(71 replies, posted in News)

hmm...sometimes I think I am dumb. big_smile or maybe just overworked. Sorry about that elbekko...my bad. smile