What about at the top of the dump? Is there a line that starts SET NAMES? If so, what does it say?

That's not necessarily true. It's fairly easy for a backup of latin1 data to be incorrectly called a backup of utf8 data, for example.
If you send me a copy of the dump, I can take a look at it. My email address is smartys@ this domain.

It could be any number of things, exports from MySQL are fairly tricky.
How did you generate the backup?

Fancy folders? It's just a couple small changes to the regular folder based scheme, so I'll add it (there's no reason not to as far as I can tell, and one of the other developers can revert it if they come up with a reason).
Added.

Hmm, I'm not having any problem with it on the dev forum.

Fixed

707

(5 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Closed, we have no control over the content of forums using the PunBB software. If you have a problem with it, you should discuss it with the administrator of the forum or the forum's host.

Moved to Modifications.

The point? The point is that we're able to uniquely identify the forum. Otherwise, we need to make a table of slugs and the pages they link to, deal with duplicate names, etc. Speed goes down and everything becomes more complicated.

710

(11 replies, posted in PunBB 1.3 extensions)

sopel: If you can find a PHP library that uses it, certainly, someone could develop it. However, we're likely going to focus more on services like Akismet and on features that are hard for bots to crack in the first place, like custom question(s) on signup, etc smile

711

(151 replies, posted in PunBB 1.3 extensions)

Mpok: Nobody said you were complaining, or even answered your posts in a hostile manner. wink
If you have an alternative to calling eval, we would love to hear it. However, we have tested several methods and eval is not the slowest of them. It also has the advantage that any extension code is run in the global scope, which simplifies things for extension authors. smile

Sounds like you have some whitespace before the <?php tag

713

(12 replies, posted in PunBB 1.3 troubleshooting)

Mpok: Nobody said he had to. He asked if there was a way to redirect the traffic. I said yes, I specifically added a hook so that people could write extensions to do what they want with 404 traffic.
And I don't know that it's necessarily a good idea to spend time working on documentation for writing extensions when we could be working on the code instead. Especially when a system for evaluating, searching, storing, etc extensions isn't in place.

Moved to Modifications

715

(13 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Yes, and I'm having no trouble logging in and out. Is there a problem?

716

(13 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

http://punbb.org/download/hdiff/hdiff-1 … .2.17.html

717

(13 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Logging in now works for me, logging out still doesn't.
And if you can't read the hdiff, I can't really help you, it's simpler to follow than modification instructions.

718

(13 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Yes, that cookie domain looks right.
And look at the hdiff for 1.2.17, in include/functions.php where the logout links are changed.

719

(11 replies, posted in PunBB 1.3 extensions)

Yes, there will be some official anti-spam extensions

720

(13 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Well, it's impossible to log out on your forum because you don't have the code from 1.2.17 added to your logout links.
And you should set $cookie_domain in config.php to .24-7GT.com, since you have people accessing it from both the http://www.24-7GT.com URL and the http://24-7GT.com URL.

721

(13 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 troubleshooting)

Link to your forum

Oh, I didn't realize you were talking about the extension tongue

723

(5 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Moved to PunBB Discussion, since this isn't a bug. wink
You can change the wrapping on the div that contains the post if you don't like it the way it is.

724

(12 replies, posted in PunBB 1.3 troubleshooting)

Homeboy: No, but I don't expect people to be using a piece of beta software on a production server either. tongue
When the final version is released, I fully expect someone will have coded an extension to generate a full-blown 404 page. Meanwhile, you shouldn't expect beta software to be as fully supported as the stable version, for obvious reasons wink

The same reason posts in search aren't parsed in 1.2: we only take the first 1000 characters of the message. If we parsed it, the output could be badly formed.