Search options (Page 16 of 28)

Most of my point was the uselessness of the .htm end-string (which is a double non-sense). Adding good keywords in the url is always a good idea.

That would make quite a nice extension.

If you want money for GPL code, the ransoms are quite a good answer (if you want something back for your time, not make a living out of it).

Basically you get some reputation, write the extension, and describe it in details. Then, you set what you think is a fair price for it. Everyone can contribute, whatever money they feel (basically they are paying for using the extension, so it depends how much it's worth for them). You add up all the money, when the ransom is met, you release the extension. If the ransom is not met, you give everyone back their money.

Several (about 20~30 I think) plugins for Textpattern where contributed in that way, it work nicely for everyone.

You can see it in the trac browsing source app.

Amen.

Gnah... PM... vade retro!

It might be useful orlandu, but that would require some serious brainstorming on the UI side. How to handle several dozens of threads for example, things like that.

Imagemagick is not so bad. However, that's more of a job for the future 1.3 extensions, no?

I don't really understand the issue. à is rendered find, whether it's a latin1 or 9 charset encoding, or a unicode encoding.

What are the forum incriminated?

Threads being marked as unread/read? If so, already planned.

As far as I know, PunBB hadn't any major security flow mass exploited. Nothing compared to PHPBB and the like.

And from what I read, security is not a "major thing to do" in 1.3, because there is nothing to do, really. If they find flaws, they will address them. And of course on the other hand they won't write specific flawed code.

So yes they could say it if it make some feel better, but it's just an illusion; 1.3 has no reason to be more or to be less secure than the previous version; and those were nicely secured.

Everyone can download the current (I would call it alpha stage) version of 1.3, it's public.

Split&Merge threads, and user multigroups belonging aren't upper on the queue than PM and attachments? 

I'm shocked