Search options (Page 10 of 119)

I'm confused. The topic asks about putting a break in the breadcrumbs and now you seem to be talking about the main menu. Which is it?

I would expect the atom feed to open a page in IE which shows the xml output and not prompt me for a file download which is what the rss feed on your site does. Have you had a look at the PunBB 1.3's atom feed, that works exactly the same as the rss feed.

Have you tried removing the doctype to see if that make a difference?

Isn't it possible that what graphic designers want is the same as everybody else i.e. something fast and easy to use so they can get in and out as quickly as possible.

You are not babbling. I've been thinking about this stuff for months. The problem is its not going to be possible to cover every possible situation therefore I have to come up with something which is flexible enough to please most of the people most of the time. In the end all of this is actually an argument in favour of templates which of course can be coded for a specific purpose.

I did think about group id's on posts as well as various other things but ended up with seven classes on the same div. Thats another problem. There are tons of useful things that can be done but you have to know when to stop. Again it comes down to what is going to be most useful to most people.

I always want to hear what difficutlies people are having though because my idea of what users might want to do is purely my own opinion and it might not accurately reflect what people really want or need.

One addition that would certainly be useful is either class="external" or rel="external" on links which would allow for javascript to open a new window for external links.

Don't assume screen readers work in a particularl way and more importantly don't assume accessibility is only about blind people.  All in all title attributes would seem to be at best a waste of space and at worst positively harmful. I also tend to think tooltips are ugly but thats just a personal preference.

For more information
http://www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog/articles … ttributes/

If anything, I would rather put this type of functionality in a span within the link which means you could control its display with css. Either that or a javascript expander which would actually show/hide the information in the table cell as normal text. However, all in all I don't like the idea. If I were using vbulletin I think its something I would want to disable.

That the CMS was either GPL itself or that PunBB was distributed as a separate module and that the CMS did not require PunBB in order to work. As I understand it thats whats required to comply with the GPL.

You can use MySQL and in fact you should. Basically just install a standard LAMP setup unless you have a burning desire to run lighty or litespeed etc.

Just to make sure its not some weird display problem, if you view the output source is stuff still missing.

Slightly longer answer. You can use it for whatever you like. The GPL only really becomes relevant if you want to distribute PunBB to others either on its own or more likely combined with your own software. Using PunBB on commercial sites is actually something we would like to see more of.

Try
div.rss_box ul.rss_items li.rss_item {padding-bottom: 0.5em}