Search options (Page 5 of 18)

Guns

Compiling isnt that hard. When there is a will, there is a way.

Honostly, I think that it dosen't really matter. How many times are you going to install this infront of other people?

Hate to double post, but...

The reason that microsoft made a page about its "supiriority" over linux is to avoid this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4276287.stm , from happening.

Wasn't something like this occuring about 6 months ago with MD5?

That is regardless. Even with so many "Trained" personal reading through the codes, flaws exist. The cost it takes for Microsoft to do this is transfered to the user, who buys the product, and often times is frustrated by the cost to complexity ratio.

For Microsoft to openly critizse the opensource community is not only foolish, but uncalled for. If Microsoft has confidence behind their product, they do not need to create such a site. The fact that they have shows that a. they have begun loosing their ground, or b. they have lost contracts due to opensource.

I never said that Linux was 100% better then windows, how else could I play my games? From a server administrators perspective, the posibilities offered from Linux are infinite compared to other server OS, IMHO.

Another thing that seperates Linux from Microsoft is the fact that the basis behind Microsoft, as anyother business is commerical/corporate. Because no one owns Linux, the use of it only benifits the community.

Lets also face another fact, most companies who use, run, and stand behind linux are those who have contracts with the distubuters. Red Hat, SuSe, and so on.

Its also important to follow the trend setters, as IBM. They have been pushing foward with the battle cry of linux. If linux us truly a "waste of time", why is the most recognized tech company in the world supporting it?

No doubt that in some cases, Microsoft is better, but to say that Microsoft is always better, and Linux is just a time consuming, worthless pos is just plain stupid.

You could go and set up virtual hosts...

I've actually have seen adssence screw up pages before. If you screw around with the code too much, then they wont accept it.

My friend had it on his site, and the way he had coded it, whenever someone posted something, adsence would post a blank copy.

Moral of this post: be careful.

My own website. If I get tired looking at it, maybe its time for a change.

I think thats exactly the point. He wants to have a site that is invitation only, including the forums. He dosen't want it open to the world, only to the members he wants. Sort of a members only.

Isn't it eaiser just to have .htaccess/.htpasswd combination?