Search options (Page 16 of 307)

Yes, that was someone trying an SQL inject. The reason it's logged there is because the URL was too long for the field and PostgreSQL choked on it.

1. Yes, you can edit the call to fsockopen in include/email.php. However, the timeout is currently set to 15 seconds: it sounds more like your forum has no connection at all, at times.
2. Yes, edit post.php, line 218 and remove the part of the large query that refers to the previous post time.

If I were you though, I would focus more on fixing the underlying issue with connections rather than on trying to hack around it and send more emails.

Well, feel free to test out 1.3 and let us know if you run into any trouble with the UTF-8 support

What you're doing.
test_function() does not run the command
test_function(false) does not run the command
test_function(true) runs the command

When Bekko said run, he meant the function.

The issues probably don't exist because of the tweaks I've made to that site to support UTF-8 with 1.2. The issue wouldn't be fixed in 1.2.17, since 1.2 does not have UTF-8 support built in. 1.3, the version currently under development, does.

You don't need the {}s surrounding it.
And if you want to change the text of the email, you should probably create a new template, edit that, and then change this line

$mail_tpl = trim(file_get_contents(PUN_ROOT.'lang/'.$pun_user['language'].'/mail_templates/welcome.tpl'));

to refer to the new file.

Edit register.php? The code would be similar to the other code you're referring to, just without an if statement

Yeah, the error_log is what you need to look at. The error you're getting is a generic one from the webserver and as it says: "More information about this error may be available in the server error log."

Check your error_log and see what the error is.

Yes, a new action is specified using an if statement.

co_common

That's more of an issue of hook placement than anything else. We just need to put a hook before we echo out anything in each section. It's something that would need to be addressed anyway.

Well, potentially you could, since styles can have their own templates. The question is whether it's better to just let extensions take over, since they're more flexible.