26

(8 replies, posted in General discussion)

I downloaded and installed the dev version to play around with last night.  I was getting some wacky errors in some of the display fields of the admin forms, but now I don't recall where exactly.  Overall, its a marked improvement to the existing version, though.  Pretty cool stuff.

I want to hack PunBB/MovableType so my most recent MT post auto-generates a thread topic in PunBB, but didn't want to mess with it until the next release is available.  Or has someone already done something similar?  This way, I can disable comments in MT (and avoid comment spam), and have an excuse to use Rickard's software.  wink

27

(8 replies, posted in General discussion)

Rickard,

Sorry if this is already posted somewhere, but do you have an expected release date for PunBB 1.2?

dmz

28

(14 replies, posted in General discussion)

I honestly made it through all 20 levels without reversing my mouse.  It was a major pain in the @$$.

There's a few more games on that site, similar to this one.

29

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

Queen of England

30

(14 replies, posted in General discussion)

try this

http://www.scenta.co.uk/reverse/

31

(14 replies, posted in General discussion)

I see a man displaying a sense of humor to some friends and colleagues years before he held public office.

32

(6 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

Are you trying to reproduce Wikipedia?

Edit: read this wiki software

33

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

cholesterol

34

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

space

35

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

middleground wrote:

You see statements like this are typical of the attitude toward Americans- you only know what you are told.

To be fair, a lot of times its the same on our side of the pond.  wink

middleground wrote:

Unfortunately, as dmz noted, majority rules.

I hope you don't really mean that!  Or did you mean unfortunately in the sense that Bush gained reelection?  Its always tough when your side, whichever that may be, doesn't get its way.  But that's also the best part of living where we do... if enough people get sick of the status quo, it can be changed, unlike other parts of the world -- and in that sense, we're all on the same side.

middleground wrote:

that a majoirty of those posting are late teens to early twenties in age.

I'm 29.

This thread could go on forever, and the election has come and gone, so I'm going to move on as others have.  Hopefully, everyone posting out here realizes that sharing opinions and learning from one another is what really matters, and nobody walks away from here with any hard feelings.  That is sometimes the dangerous part of Internet forums.  I've enjoyed reading all of the opinions in this thread, especially from those who are so far away from me (I'm in Sioux Falls, SD).

See you around...

36

(1,382 replies, posted in General discussion)

for not smoking

37

(24 replies, posted in Feature requests)

That's a pretty common feature in other forums, but I've never really understood what good it does.  With something like instant message software, I can see this as being desirable, but why in forums?

38

(11 replies, posted in General discussion)

Rickard wrote:

My eyes are still bleeding after visiting http://www.postgresql.org/ and looking at the logo at the top.

</rant>

Wow, that is pretty bad.

39

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

Rickard wrote:

The fact that more people voted than ever is of a good thing, but it hardly changes the fact that Bush won by a margin of 2% (274/252).

Those are the electoral college numbers, but the actual votes cast yield a similar number.  59,369,452 for Bush vs. 55,853,451 for Kerry.  Still, its a majority, and with our form of government the majority rules.

Rickard wrote:

It surprises me because I had hardly heard any of the candidates discuss the morality questions. All I heard was terrorist this and terrorist that. I also think it's sad that we let the religious beliefs of some people dictate the lives of other people.

Iraq was the big topic, yes, but the candidates spoke to morality issues throughout the campaign.

I tend to disagree with you *to a degree* about the religious beliefs dictating the lives of others.  Most civilized societies are governed by some basic rules of right and wrong (thou shalt not kill, for instance) and I see nothing wrong with those sorts of religious beliefs turning into laws to govern by.  Issues such as homosexuality, abortion, stem cell research, etc. are another story.  A lot of folks feel that this falls into playing God territory, and while some may see this as being backwards you still have to remember that Christian conservatives have a lot of pull in The United States.

Rickard wrote:

IANAL, but would a ban on gay marriage not be in direct conflict with that clause?

Again, majority rules.  The majority, regardless of how slim that may have been this time around, has spoken and they do not want gay marriages.

countryfullofmorons wrote:

Bush is an absolute moron

Opinions vary.

40

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

Over three million votes is a margin, yes.  I didn't claim it was a landslide, but it was probably the largest voter turnout in this country ever, and he did win more popular votes than any other President in history, including Reagan.

There is a huge Christian voting population in The United States, why does the morality question surprise you?  True, there are more pressing issues (economy, war, etc) but people live their day-to-day lives with certain beliefs, and that very much affects the votes they cast.

41

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

Even after the millions of dollars the Democrats and "documentary" makers spent in anti-Bush efforts... he still won reelection, and by the largest popular vote in US history WITH a margin of 3.5 million votes.  He may not be popular elsewhere, but he sure seems to be here at home.  How 'bout them Republicans:

"Bush maintained or increased his vote in every state but Vermont. Republicans picked up seats in the House and Senate, and continue to dominate state governorships. Also making history of a sort, Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle lost his election, marking the first time in half a century a Senate leader has been defeated."

42

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

zaher wrote:

Constitution is changed or Bush stages a military coup (never happen)

Why i think someday will be happen not "(never happen)" ?

I'm not sure I understand you.  While it is entirely possible that the Constitution could be altered (Presidential term limit has actually been a hot topic in recent years), it is just not feasible that a sitting President would/could stage a coup in this country.  Too many things would have to fall into place, or rather fall apart, for such an event to happen.  Is that what you were getting at?

43

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

zaher wrote:

1 - War on Iran

Very doubtful, unless Iran nukes Israel or something extremely drastic happens.  There's no way we could pull this off given the current deployment of our military.  If war breaks out in either Iran or N. Korea, I'm going to quit my job and spend the rest of my short days getting drunk somewhere tropical, because its all over for all of us.

zaher wrote:

2 - War on Syria

I could see some sort of military "pressure" put on Syria before Iran, but again there's no way this is going to happen.  Too much going on in Iraq, military is overdeployed, no real reason to do so, etc.

zaher wrote:

3 - Some one destroy something in USA

My fear is that this is inevitable anyway, regardless of who wins the Presidency.

zaher wrote:

4 - state of emergency need cancel any elections and another 4 years
etc

And now, the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution of The United States of America:

"Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once..."

Forbidden by our laws, so unless our Constitution is changed or Bush stages a military coup (never happen), you need not worry yourself with this notion.

44

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

Rickard wrote:

So if you were born American, contrary to aspiring to be an American, you're not expected to know the answers to those questions?

No, you said you didn't think most Americans could pass the test.  I said they shouldn't have to because if they were educated in this country, then they've already passed it in a sense.

I'm just arguing for the sake of arguing. smile  Actually, if you read the entire test, and not just that dude's snippet of it, it is VERY difficult.  Its not easy to become a US citizen, it requires some homework.

45

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

Rickard wrote:
dmz wrote:
Rickard wrote:

So it's allright then? Blaming capitalism for pollution is like blaming Islam for 9/11.

Neither of these have any similarity whatsoever.

But they do. Just because extreme capitalism has a tendency to be detrimental on the environment doesn't mean it's inherently bad. Similarly, extreme islamism has a tendency to lead to terrorism, but that doesn't mean it's inherently bad.

The United States has only been around for 200 odd years.  We grew to where we are in a relatively short span of time.  I am not justifying anything, just stating a point that had we known in the beginning what we know now, maybe some things would be different.  But signing a treaty which would be detrimental to our economy isn't the answer.  As someone else said, we can't just pull the plug and reverse 200 years of growth.  We need other solutions.  Take another look at that article I posted about China.  You will soon be bitching about them as well.

Religion in any form has been the source of waaaaaay too much bloodshed over the years.  But when you present radical ideas to poor, oppressed people who feel they have nothing to live for other than to kill a certain group of people, that's when the trouble starts.

Now excuse me, I'm late for work and I have to go vote.  smile

46

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

Rickard wrote:

Who gives a ****? smile

Just because you apparently have no sense of national pride, doesn't mean others don't.  I for one care about our traditions and heritage.  Do you know your national anthem?

Rickard wrote:

Safe to say, I wouldn't have passed it (failed on 5, 9 and 10). Then again, I doubt most americans would pass it.

Most Americans shouldn't have to.  We were schooled in this country and learned most of this stuff by age ten.

47

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

Rickard wrote:

So it's allright then? Blaming capitalism for pollution is like blaming Islam for 9/11.

Neither of these have any similarity whatsoever.

48

(133 replies, posted in General discussion)

Rickard wrote:
dmz wrote:

The United States of America is not a democracy.  It is a Republic.

Ok, we need to sort this out. The US isn't a democracy, it's a republic. The Merriam-Webster dictionary definition of a democracy reads:

a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

How can that not apply to the US as well? I don't get it.

I just thought you should know this when you decide to move to The United States.  ;-)

49

(11 replies, posted in General discussion)

I'm having luck with Thunderbird.

Oh, baby.  CSS Zen Garden has got to be one of my favorites.  (oops, posted the French version)