326

(10 replies, posted in General discussion)

hehe ... suppose they've seen how popular mysql has become ... and want a piece of it wink

327

(69 replies, posted in News)

mi wrote:

backup? nah, for sissies! wink

one day you'll regret it wink

have you followed the installationguide mentioned on the first post in this thread. It has a section on how to setup the board for larger files than 2000 bytes (as most servers differs, one need to setup it according to your server, and setting it too high default will make files 'go lost' without any clue why)

so, make sure you've set the variables correctly

329

(69 replies, posted in News)

I'm looking forward to that (not timewise/workload, but that new extension thingie smile) ... as I know some things I would like to change atm (in the attachment mod) that would just be truly annoying to change in the current state wink

330

(69 replies, posted in News)

updated all my forums ... as scheduled within 24 hours since release wink  (actually within 30 minutes since I saw it was released big_smile)

331

(5 replies, posted in Archive)

inget strul med din browser som cachear en ej aktuell sida?

(tryck ctrl+F5 för att forcera omladdning, eller addera ?jibberich=12 i slutet av adressen för att forcera ev cache i Apache att refresha)

as in your second snippet

333

(21 replies, posted in General discussion)

then the big question is ... was it 1.2.8.5465 or 1.2.8.5464 I had installed ... or perhaps 1.2.8.5456 ... and then I need to ask Rickard how I would upgrade to go from 1.2.8.5456 to 1.2.8.5465 ...

see my point? wink

I know that all my forums run 1.2.9 ... not that many numbers to keep track on, and as soon as I see 1.2.10 I know for sure it's time to upgrade wink

As soon as possible ... usually check what's been fixed so I know if I need to make it even faster wink  (i.e. if it's only stuff for admin/mods or register globals, I know I don't have to stress ... but if it isn't, I try to do it within a day ... )

hmm ... considering you posted that you haven't updated, you should probably do so pretty quick ... there are probably not only nice peiple looking on this site ... perhaps you'll soon figure out why it's worth upgrading security fixes ... hopefully not, but why take a chanse? wink

335

(21 replies, posted in General discussion)

IMHO
why change something that works fine?

(enough people seems to miss that last number as it's now, how many wouldn't miss adding security fixes if there's a shitload of numbers to keep track on wink)

336

(121 replies, posted in PunBB 1.2 discussion)

looks really nice smile

(ps put hooks where the attachment mod needs to be wink ds)

running debian stable, so no problem for me ... (4.3.10)

It's the same changes as those for 1.2.6 that is mentioned on the installation guide. I don't think the security fixes after 1.2.6 has affected the mod in any way.

I wrote it so it would be possible to mod, and tried to make loads of comments and stuff smile

the gdstuff I decided not to implement, due to the extra load ... but I suppose it shouldn't be that hard



as a sidenote, I run it successfully on a 1.2.8 version ... so it still works smile
and a future thing I might do is to tweak the filename generator to make backups even simpler (to add some smalll stuff at the front of the filename to help sorting it, but still keep the random letters at the end to make bruteforcing hard) + optimize the viewtopic code ...
But, I suppose I won't have much time until PunBB 1.3 is released to make any changes unless any security issues arise...

340

(67 replies, posted in News)

I love the hdiffs ... a couple of minutes of copy + paste and then copy those modified files to all my forums ... hmm... next time I might test the 'automatic' upgrading from the diff files big_smile

you mean this? wink

no preview, works the same way for all users allowed to view (making previews will hog resources)

you can put an image in a post by checking what url the image has ...

http://se.php.net/manual/en/ref.image.php

it's a module to php

hmm... I thought I had put the attachment things after Rickards stuff, obvoisly not ... then, perhaps its not so good to use it?

keldar wrote:

Followed, and installed now.  Thanks smile smile

rgds

Si

nice to hear you got it working smile

(myself I haven't upgraded yet ... no go to be in flue clouds and try to do an update big_smile ... but the security patches didn't affect me, so I can take it easy wink)

crazy wrote:

The link to file and icon attach no appears and same file is not in the folder.

I didn't get that?  (I'm sick with flue or something, but I still think it's a bit unclear)

Please email me to the adress in my signature and I'll try to help out ... describe what works and what doesn't work, and I'll do my very best to help out smile

yep, I believe that should be correct


remember that you still have the quirks of 1.2.6 mentioned in this installation guide aswell
http://frankh.shacknet.nu/index.php?section=15

well ... there's no such strings in the attachment lang files

Either write your message in there (easiest if you only have one language, just replace $lang_attach['Not allowed to post attachments'] with 'your errormessage' ), or add the appropiate lines in the lang files as the other stuff in there is written, somehting like this:

'Not allowed to post attachments' => 'what you want to say'

349

(24 replies, posted in General discussion)

more popular = more vulnerable ...

ah, it was in that file smile